 | |
02-02-2004, 04:53 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 81
| » 
Upgrade from Win2k to WinXP or not?
I have a pretty old machine, HP Pavilion 8533Z:
CPU: Intel Celeron 500MHZ
RAM: 256MB PC133 SDRAM ( Expanded from 128MB)
HARD: 120GB MAXTOR EIDE 2MB Cache (New HD)
Motherboard: Intel 810 chipset with integrated grahpics.
The machine is a bit slow now, and currently it is running windows 2000 pro. I am wondering if upgrading to WinXP will give it a slight performance boost.
BTW, I am not using this as a game machine. Mostly it is used for office applications, email, web-browsering, and mp3 playing.
Thanks!
|
| |
02-02-2004, 04:58 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: NW burbs of Chicago
Posts: 538
|
Win2k has all the features (if you have service pack...5 i believe?) as windows xp i heard.... so its all about if you want the candy coated interface or not pretty much.... i myself prefer Win2k because there is no activation and annoying stuff
i wouldnt
just my 2 cents
-Rob-
|
| |
02-02-2004, 05:11 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,379
|
Personally I'd stick with Win2k. I think it's the perfect OS for office apps and hardware like yours.
__________________
Registered Linux User: 288411
Licensed Windows XP User
|
| |
02-03-2004, 08:45 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Bottom left of U.S.
Posts: 4,714
|
I doubt if you will see any performance boost.
I have both and I prefer 2K myself.
Any performance issues you have is with the machine not the OS.
IMO,
Bill
|
| |
02-03-2004, 09:46 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: TOO close to Wash DC
Posts: 7,956
|
IMO XP would only make your box MORE sluggish due to the overly OBESE nature of XP
__________________
<< Insert exceedingly large and overly verbose message of how 1337 you are here including full specs of every vehicle you've ever driven and PC you've owned >>
|
| |
02-03-2004, 09:50 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: 2nd oldst city in AR
Posts: 909
|
True... XP is obese, however one can put it on a diet and remove features that are not needed or desired.
__________________
First Rule of Networking...
Check Your Cables and Connections
|
| |
02-03-2004, 09:53 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Ft. Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 4,056
| Quote: Originally posted by Christian-Comp True... XP is obese, however one can put it on a diet and remove features that are not needed or desired. | ...thus, turning back into 2K!
Stick with 2K, XP will do nothing more for you.
|
| |
02-03-2004, 09:59 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Oregon,USA
Posts: 325
|
Have to agree with the general concensus...win2k is basically xp without the window dressings...if you're looking for a mild performance boost in win2k, do the standard disk cleaning, defragmenting, registry cleanup, and startup management.
|
| |
02-03-2004, 10:21 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,379
|
Have you considered upgrading your processor?
I'm only saying that because I had almost your exact configuration a couple years ago and I upgraded my 500mhz celeron to a 950mhz Celeron for less than $65. It made a noticable difference in the machine for very little money.
EDIT: I spoke too soon. A quick check at Newegg shows that the only Celery they have with a 100 mhz bus is a 1.3 and it's Tualatin based and I doubt your mobo will support that. http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...log=343&depa=1
Sorry!
You may be able to find what something else somewhere else though.
__________________
Registered Linux User: 288411
Licensed Windows XP User
Last edited by Scott Tiger; 02-03-2004 at 10:25 AM.
|
| |
02-03-2004, 11:04 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 1,539
|
IMO, for your uses stick with W2K Pro. We migrated to XP Pro solely for the improved H/W and game compatability. The eye-candy is nice if you've got the horses... but W2K is fine. Save your self the $150-200 and try to find a faster CPU for your mobo, and double the ram.
__________________
A man becomes rich not by having what he wants, but by wanting what he haves.
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Most Active Discussions  | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |