»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Tech Support

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2004, 04:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 81
jxcheng is on a distinguished road
Upgrade from Win2k to WinXP or not?

I have a pretty old machine, HP Pavilion 8533Z:

CPU: Intel Celeron 500MHZ
RAM: 256MB PC133 SDRAM ( Expanded from 128MB)
HARD: 120GB MAXTOR EIDE 2MB Cache (New HD)
Motherboard: Intel 810 chipset with integrated grahpics.

The machine is a bit slow now, and currently it is running windows 2000 pro. I am wondering if upgrading to WinXP will give it a slight performance boost.

BTW, I am not using this as a game machine. Mostly it is used for office applications, email, web-browsering, and mp3 playing.

Thanks!

jxcheng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2004, 04:58 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
teengeek88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NW burbs of Chicago
Posts: 538
teengeek88 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to teengeek88 Send a message via Yahoo to teengeek88
Win2k has all the features (if you have service pack...5 i believe?) as windows xp i heard.... so its all about if you want the candy coated interface or not pretty much.... i myself prefer Win2k because there is no activation and annoying stuff

i wouldnt

just my 2 cents

-Rob-
teengeek88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2004, 05:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Scott Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,379
Scott Tiger is on a distinguished road
Personally I'd stick with Win2k. I think it's the perfect OS for office apps and hardware like yours.
__________________
Registered Linux User: 288411
Licensed Windows XP User
Scott Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2004, 08:45 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Bill in SD, CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bottom left of U.S.
Posts: 4,714
Bill in SD, CA is on a distinguished road
I doubt if you will see any performance boost.

I have both and I prefer 2K myself.

Any performance issues you have is with the machine not the OS.

IMO,

Bill
Bill in SD, CA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2004, 09:46 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: TOO close to Wash DC
Posts: 7,956
vass0922 is on a distinguished road
IMO XP would only make your box MORE sluggish due to the overly OBESE nature of XP
__________________
<< Insert exceedingly large and overly verbose message of how 1337 you are here including full specs of every vehicle you've ever driven and PC you've owned >>
vass0922 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2004, 09:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Christian-Comp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 2nd oldst city in AR
Posts: 909
Christian-Comp is on a distinguished road
True... XP is obese, however one can put it on a diet and remove features that are not needed or desired.
__________________
First Rule of Networking...

Check Your Cables and Connections
Christian-Comp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2004, 09:53 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Martoch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ft. Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 4,056
Martoch is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Martoch
Quote:
Originally posted by Christian-Comp
True... XP is obese, however one can put it on a diet and remove features that are not needed or desired.
...thus, turning back into 2K!


Stick with 2K, XP will do nothing more for you.
Martoch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2004, 09:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Oregon,USA
Posts: 325
Gettinbye is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Gettinbye
Have to agree with the general concensus...win2k is basically xp without the window dressings...if you're looking for a mild performance boost in win2k, do the standard disk cleaning, defragmenting, registry cleanup, and startup management.
Gettinbye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2004, 10:21 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Scott Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,379
Scott Tiger is on a distinguished road
Have you considered upgrading your processor?

I'm only saying that because I had almost your exact configuration a couple years ago and I upgraded my 500mhz celeron to a 950mhz Celeron for less than $65. It made a noticable difference in the machine for very little money.

EDIT: I spoke too soon. A quick check at Newegg shows that the only Celery they have with a 100 mhz bus is a 1.3 and it's Tualatin based and I doubt your mobo will support that.

http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...log=343&depa=1

Sorry!

You may be able to find what something else somewhere else though.
__________________
Registered Linux User: 288411
Licensed Windows XP User

Last edited by Scott Tiger; 02-03-2004 at 10:25 AM.
Scott Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2004, 11:04 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jmichna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 1,539
jmichna is on a distinguished road
IMO, for your uses stick with W2K Pro. We migrated to XP Pro solely for the improved H/W and game compatability. The eye-candy is nice if you've got the horses... but W2K is fine. Save your self the $150-200 and try to find a faster CPU for your mobo, and double the ram.
__________________
A man becomes rich not by having what he wants, but by wanting what he haves.
jmichna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 AM.