»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Tech Support

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2004, 12:37 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 45
JohnnyNapalm is on a distinguished road
AMD 2400+ FSB questions

My ram is 2700, so it's running at 166x2 so 333 effective. The default fsb for the cpu is 133...and i can get it running at 166 and 200 as well...wouldn't it make more sense to run my cpu at the same fsb (166) so it's matched up with the ram? I've never had a board that let me do so much with my fsb and multipliers, and i'm scared i'm gonna mess something up. Also, would running my 2400+ (2ghz) at a fsb of 200 x 10 multiplier hurt anything? Thanks!

__________________
Shuttle AN35N nForce2 Ultra with an AMD 2400+ @ 3200 +
2x512 PC3200 Dual Channel RAM
40 GB WD 7200 2MB Cache,120 GB Seagate 7200 8MB Cache
Lite-On 52x32x52, 10x DVD-ROM
Soundblaster Audigy 2, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro, ATI TV Wonder, 450W PSU
JohnnyNapalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 12:59 AM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
wallie_x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 146
wallie_x is on a distinguished road
A 2400 Athlon XP is not designed to runn at 166x2. It most likely wouldn't boot at that FSB setting. Some chipsets run well asynchronous i.e. 133FSB CPU/166 FSB memory. Or you can experiment increasing the FSB synchronous with the memory and bench mark it to see what sort of munbers you get.
wallie_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 01:02 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
rpertusio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 1,013
rpertusio is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to rpertusio
Neither should 'hurt'.

In fact, many suggest that running the CPU and RAM in 'sync' FSB speeds, they get better performance.

I have not proved that to be true on my particular system, but many people swear by it.

Remember that a higher FSB could overclock the rest of your components, depending on your motherboard. This could be bad or good thing. Overclocking other components will give them a boost in performance too. However, some are sensitive to higher frequencies, and will be the stumbling block in your way to a good overclock.

My CPU was designed for 133fsb, but I have it overclocked to a stable 172mhz. I can get it above 200mhz, but not 'stable'.

- rp
rpertusio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 01:05 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 45
JohnnyNapalm is on a distinguished road
i've got the shuttle an35n ultra, which "locks" the pci frequency, allowing a FSB increase to only effect the CPU. Posted below is what 3d mark is telling me, after i put the fsb at 166 and multiplier at 12.

AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ 2.0 GHz
Manufacturer AMD
Family AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
Internal Clock 2.0 GHz
Internal Clock Maximum 2.0 GHz
External Clock 166.0 MHz
Socket Designation Socket A
Upgrade ZIF Socket
HyperThreadingTechnology N/A
Capabilities MMX, CMov, RDTSC, 3DNow!, Extended 3DNow!, SSE
Version AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
Caches
Level 1 128 KB
Level 2 256 KB
__________________
Shuttle AN35N nForce2 Ultra with an AMD 2400+ @ 3200 +
2x512 PC3200 Dual Channel RAM
40 GB WD 7200 2MB Cache,120 GB Seagate 7200 8MB Cache
Lite-On 52x32x52, 10x DVD-ROM
Soundblaster Audigy 2, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro, ATI TV Wonder, 450W PSU
JohnnyNapalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 01:09 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
rpertusio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 1,013
rpertusio is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to rpertusio
You might also want to lock the AGP frequency if you have that option
rpertusio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 01:24 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 45
JohnnyNapalm is on a distinguished road
bumped the mult. to 12.5, and now the chip is detected as a 2600+...is this normal?

AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ 2.1 GHz
Manufacturer AMD
Family AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
Internal Clock 2.1 GHz
Internal Clock Maximum 2.1 GHz
External Clock 166.0 MHz
Socket Designation Socket A
Upgrade ZIF Socket
HyperThreadingTechnology N/A
Capabilities MMX, CMov, RDTSC, 3DNow!, Extended 3DNow!, SSE
Version AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
Caches
Level 1 128 KB
Level 2 256 KB
__________________
Shuttle AN35N nForce2 Ultra with an AMD 2400+ @ 3200 +
2x512 PC3200 Dual Channel RAM
40 GB WD 7200 2MB Cache,120 GB Seagate 7200 8MB Cache
Lite-On 52x32x52, 10x DVD-ROM
Soundblaster Audigy 2, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro, ATI TV Wonder, 450W PSU
JohnnyNapalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 01:24 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 45
JohnnyNapalm is on a distinguished road
bumped the mult. to 12.5, and now the chip is detected as a 2600+...is this normal?

AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ 2.1 GHz
Manufacturer AMD
Family AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
Internal Clock 2.1 GHz
Internal Clock Maximum 2.1 GHz
External Clock 166.0 MHz
Socket Designation Socket A
Upgrade ZIF Socket
HyperThreadingTechnology N/A
Capabilities MMX, CMov, RDTSC, 3DNow!, Extended 3DNow!, SSE
Version AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
Caches
Level 1 128 KB
Level 2 256 KB
__________________
Shuttle AN35N nForce2 Ultra with an AMD 2400+ @ 3200 +
2x512 PC3200 Dual Channel RAM
40 GB WD 7200 2MB Cache,120 GB Seagate 7200 8MB Cache
Lite-On 52x32x52, 10x DVD-ROM
Soundblaster Audigy 2, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro, ATI TV Wonder, 450W PSU
JohnnyNapalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 01:24 AM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 45
JohnnyNapalm is on a distinguished road
bumped the mult. to 12.5, and now the chip is detected as a 2600+...is this normal?

AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ 2.1 GHz
Manufacturer AMD
Family AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
Internal Clock 2.1 GHz
Internal Clock Maximum 2.1 GHz
External Clock 166.0 MHz
Socket Designation Socket A
Upgrade ZIF Socket
HyperThreadingTechnology N/A
Capabilities MMX, CMov, RDTSC, 3DNow!, Extended 3DNow!, SSE
Version AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
Caches
Level 1 128 KB
Level 2 256 KB
__________________
Shuttle AN35N nForce2 Ultra with an AMD 2400+ @ 3200 +
2x512 PC3200 Dual Channel RAM
40 GB WD 7200 2MB Cache,120 GB Seagate 7200 8MB Cache
Lite-On 52x32x52, 10x DVD-ROM
Soundblaster Audigy 2, ATI Radeon 9800 Pro, ATI TV Wonder, 450W PSU
JohnnyNapalm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 01:26 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
rpertusio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hershey, PA
Posts: 1,013
rpertusio is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to rpertusio
yes. that's normal.

The CPU is determined by its multiplier. When you change the multiplier, then it sees it as a different CPU.

- rp
rpertusio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 01:31 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 461
beppodmime is on a distinguished road
Yes, it's normal. The BIOS bases which name string to give the CPU based on the clock speeds in the different models of chips.

As far as the question of running the RAM and CPU FSB in sync goes:

In almost every case, with nForce2 boards, running the RAM and CPU clocks in sync will net you better performance, and better benchmark scores than you will get from running your RAM faster than your FSB. This definately holds true for people running the CPU FSB at 166MHz and the memory clock at 200MHz, although I'm not too sure about 133MHz CPU and 166MHz memory. Best way to check this would be to run a series of benchmarks between the two setups, and see for yourselves.
__________________
"I was absolutely astounded that something like a Chee-to could become a pop icon," said Evans. "It's international. I've even seen it online on a Russian site."

beppodmime is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:37 PM.