 |
01-03-2004, 08:57 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Sewanee, TN
Posts: 2,897
| » 
What is the "new K7S5A"
So what do you all think the new ECS K7S5A board is? By which I mean a dirt cheap, stable board with a ton of features and high performance that has achieved a somewhat ubiquitous status due to the combination of such?
I was just wondering because the K7S5A is a bit... er... old to be doing new builds with (and doesn't support 333/400 fsb athlons either).
So what is the "new K7S5A?"
Sam
|
| |
01-03-2004, 09:43 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Uh, Oregon . . . . y
Posts: 1,441
|
Hey Sam --
I picked up and installed one of the new K7S5APro boards about a month ago and set it up as a [FAD] cruncher.
It was very unstable with the original BIOS. Once I installed the Cheepoman BIOS, it was stable and OC'ed beautifully. Unfortunately, I'm still running PC133 SDRAM in it, but I have a stick of PC2100 DDR to install in it as soon as I get a chance.
For a board that I only paid $54 for, I'm pretty happy with the crunching its been doing.
Harder
|
| |
01-03-2004, 11:29 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Sewanee, TN
Posts: 2,897
|
Ha, well you don't have to convince me that the original is a good board, but what about newer boards (with newer chipsets)?
Surely someone's got an opinion on that.
Sam
|
| |
01-03-2004, 11:48 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 530
|
IMO, ECS L7S7A2, DDR400 support, supports 333fsb, built in LAN, and 6 USB2
__________________
Whoa, this is on? Hmmmm...
|
| |
01-04-2004, 12:08 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 108
|
Shuttle AN35N ultra? Where I live it's cheaper than some KT400 mobos...
|
| |
01-04-2004, 12:05 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Sewanee, TN
Posts: 2,897
|
I don't know about the L7S7A2, I think the day of the SiS 74X chipset may have come and gone.
The Shuttle board sounds pretty good, lean (has most things you need, nothing you don't), mean (nforce-2 ultra 400 chipset), and fairly cheap (63$ at newegg, shipped right now).
How does shuttle's quality/stability stack up to ECS's, or for that matter, any other board maker's?
Anyone else have any diamonds-in-the-rough?
Sam
|
| |
01-05-2004, 03:24 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Sewanee, TN
Posts: 2,897
|
Maybe I'm just talking to myself, but how does that Shuttle board compare to the Biostar board pointed out here?
|
| |
01-05-2004, 03:44 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: SE Kansas 66762
Posts: 1,163
|
They are both great boards. The Shuttle AN35N-Ultra supports Dual Channel memory. That and the $ difference. If you want dual channel then the Shuttle is the way to go. Both are great boards at very good prices.
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Most Active Discussions  | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |