I just purchased this vid card (cause circut city siad i could exchange it till the end of january to upgrade if i dont like it) and also need for speed underground to test. But anyways it work well and i dont see any lag or sags works well i benchmarked and got a 6500 on 3dmark2001se but anyways if there is a diffrence in cards where is it and where can i give it the ultimate test. I though NFS underground should have been a good test if there is what is it.? But other then that this card works great
The 9600SE is a marketing gimmic. It is severely restricted by it's 64bit memory bus. Looking around the internet, it looks like that 6500 score in 3dmark2001se is about normal . If I were you I would take it back and get a real 9600.
Just to give you an idea about how the 9600Pro performs ...
My 9600Pro scored around 11000 with XP1900+/1GB/WinXP... nothing OCed, all default speeds ...
Its too bad that you bottlenecked your powerful system with such a low end video card.
Ya the SEs are quite below bar.. I get a score of around 10,000 with a ti4200 from a year and a half ago, and an amd xp 2000+ all running at default speeds