»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Tech Support

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2003, 10:39 AM   #1 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Redhat 9 support NTFS

with all the redhat news today i still enjoy using it because of the professional and stable preformance

i have a laptop with a 20 gig hard drive. i put win2k on 14 gigs of it and redhat 9. when i used mandrake 9.1/9.2 it would automatically mount the window drives.


i tried to do

mount -t /dev/hda1 /mnt/windows

it says NTFS is not support

i was reading around and there is a module that i have to install?

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 10:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Scott Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,379
Scott Tiger is on a distinguished road
Here you go:

http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/info/redhat.html

Let me know if you're still having problems.
__________________
Registered Linux User: 288411
Licensed Windows XP User
Scott Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 10:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's not advised.

There was another thread around here asking about it as well. I don't think it's a fault of *nix though, blame M$.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 10:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Scott Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,379
Scott Tiger is on a distinguished road
To my knowledge there's not problem with Mounting an NFTS partition with read-only support. It the ability to write to NTFS partitions that gets you into trouble.

I've heard rumblings in other forums over why you wouldn't want to have NFTS reading or writing capability in the kernel but have never seen any proof to support it.
__________________
Registered Linux User: 288411
Licensed Windows XP User
Scott Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 10:52 AM   #5 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Scott Tiger
but have never seen any proof to support it.
Nobody is brave enough to try it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 10:53 AM   #6 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thanks scott and evil, i dont want to write to it. just be able to access some pictures and mp3's.

thanks


Jason
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 10:56 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Scott Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,379
Scott Tiger is on a distinguished road
No, that's not what I meant ER. I've seen posts in other forums that RH left NTFS reading capabilty out of their stock kernel because that module caused system instability. Since legal reasons were the most likely reason for RH leaving that out of the stock kernel I've pretty much ignored that (esp since I've used NTFS reading capability in my kernels and have never had any problems).

I thought that is what you were referring to in your first post.
__________________
Registered Linux User: 288411
Licensed Windows XP User
Scott Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 11:04 AM   #8 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It always comes down to $$$.

What's going to happen when Longhorn comes out and WinFS, I wouldn't be surprised if it's not able to be read by any other OS but a version of Windows. And then to write to it, you'll HAVE TO HAVE Windows XP or later.

I can't believe, all this fuss just so GZ3 can look at pr0n on either Windows or Linux . . .
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 03:01 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epyon9283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Brunswick, NJ, USA
Posts: 783
Epyon9283 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Epyon9283 Send a message via AIM to Epyon9283 Send a message via Yahoo to Epyon9283
Quote:
Originally posted by EvilRick
I can't believe, all this fuss just so GZ3 can look at pr0n on either Windows or Linux . . .
Thats why you need a fat32 partition somewhere. Both can write to it
Epyon9283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2003, 03:03 PM   #10 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That's the way I have it setup.
  Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:09 AM.