 | | 
10-03-2003, 07:42 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,197
|  » 
Satellite Internet??
I can only get 56k here where I live, and was thinking about satellite. Does anyone know if that would be any good?? I have seen the high prices, $600+ for just the unit!
That is crazy!
Any help would be appreciated.
| 
|  | |
10-03-2003, 08:00 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: TOO close to Wash DC
Posts: 7,956
|
hope you're not a gamer
__________________
<< Insert exceedingly large and overly verbose message of how 1337 you are here including full specs of every vehicle you've ever driven and PC you've owned >>
| |
| | |
10-03-2003, 08:03 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Petersburg, Va
Posts: 1,791
|
its just like cable, depends on how many ppl there in ur area or any other areas got it, im thinking a few cause i can't stand 56k, and if there on alot u will get low down times, and ya if ur a gamer, u might just forget it, neither way be good, but its better than 56k, it would go that low to 56k level
| |
| | |
10-03-2003, 08:04 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,197
|
well that is my main problem, GAMING!
I can't play any of the new games because I keep lagging out...
I've been searching for cable/DSL for a year now and nothing has come up yet..
| |
| | |
10-03-2003, 08:14 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Petersburg, Va
Posts: 1,791
|
hmm moving would be a good solution for that, but even if u gotten cable, still be bad, it be just like cable
| |
| | |
10-03-2003, 08:17 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: New York
Posts: 1,588
|
Pings on satelite can be as high as 2000, gaming would be impossible, worse than 56k.
I dont really think satelite is going to be dependent on how many people are in your area... it wouldnt make sense simply due to how the technology works. It might be more dependent to the number of uses using the satelite overall.
| |
| | |
10-03-2003, 08:19 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: New York
Posts: 1,588
|
heres a quote from starbands website
"Up to 10x faster download speeds than dial-up. With speeds for Web surfing and file downloads of up to 500 kbps (targeted minimum speeds in excess of 150 kbps), downloading a file that used to take 5 minutes with dial-up can now take as little as 30 seconds!"
150kbps is pretty damn pathetic.... unless you have money coming out your ears I wouldnt recommend it
See here also: http://starband.com/residential/right.asp http://starband.com/services.asp
Last edited by VHockey86; 10-03-2003 at 08:21 PM.
| |
| | |
10-03-2003, 08:29 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Victoria, CDN
Posts: 2,083
|
How about the Directv internet sat service? any good?
| |
| | |
10-03-2003, 08:31 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: New York
Posts: 1,588
|
Its about the same as Starband... Starband used to be in conjunction with Dishnetwork but they kinda split apart.
The one from DirectTV is called "DirectPC" and has about the same speeds, they say Maximum speed of 400kbps vs the 500kbps of starband.. but its 10 dollars less per month.
Pings I presume would be about the same... rediculous (I'm commenting moreso on common sense and what I've read, to actual exerpance <end disclaimer>)
| |
| | |
10-03-2003, 08:56 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Petersburg, Va
Posts: 1,791
|
all direct tv or what ever is bad, its satellite
| |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | | | Most Active Discussions  | | | | |
Recent Discussions | | | | | |
