»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Tech Support

View Poll Results: Whats the faster card
Radeon 9000 Pro 128 3 60.00%
Radeon 9200 128 2 40.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-15-2003, 12:03 AM   #1 (permalink)
Guest
 
Darthgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,203
Darthgary is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Darthgary
Radeon 9200 vs. 9000 Pro

I allready know the answer. Whats your opinion?

Darthgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 01:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
FalcomPSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SoCal.
Posts: 1,856
FalcomPSX is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to FalcomPSX Send a message via AIM to FalcomPSX
if you know the answer, why do opinions matter?
__________________
- FalcomPSX
FalcomPSX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 11:46 AM   #3 (permalink)
Guest
 
Darthgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,203
Darthgary is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Darthgary
Curiouse.
Darthgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 11:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Prexaspes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,737
Prexaspes is on a distinguished road
This isn't a matter of opinion.

The 9000 Pro has a faster core and memory speed. And they're based on the same chip with the same features. That is not my opinion. That is the way it is.
Prexaspes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 12:03 PM   #5 (permalink)
Guest
 
Darthgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,203
Darthgary is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Darthgary
The 9200 by ATI overcocks fairly well.

Athlon XP 2800+ Barton core.
Radeon 9200 128 non including 3D Mark 01 image tests got a 7800 Score when overclocked, however when checked to perform additional image quality tests, it scored only 7200.

On a Pentium 486
Radeon 9000 Pro 128 scored a 7800 in 3dmark01 no checked to perform image quality tests, but when image quality tests were checked, the card scored 8011.

Last edited by Darthgary; 09-16-2003 at 07:57 PM.
Darthgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 12:09 PM   #6 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why not pick up a more powerful 9100 for about the same price?

Anyway.....

Radeon 9000 Pro
1100 MT/s
1100 MP/s
8.8 GB/s

Radeon 9200
1000 MT/s
1000 MP/s
6.4 GB/s

Radeon 9100
2200 MT/s
1100 MP/s
8.8 GB/s

Robert Richmond
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 12:10 PM   #7 (permalink)
Guest
 
Darthgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,203
Darthgary is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Darthgary
LOL, I knew that was cumming Rob. The specs and stuff lol.

You forgot **** speeds and memory speeds again.

Last edited by Darthgary; 09-16-2003 at 07:59 PM.
Darthgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 12:18 PM   #8 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Atleast I am consistent.

Radeon 9000 Pro
275 MHz core
275 MHz memory

Radeon 9200
250 MHz core
200 MHz memory

Radeon 9100
275 MHz core
275 MHz memory

I skip MHz ratings because they mean little due to variances in pipeline designs for different architecures.

Anyway, I am still pushing the 9100 as the best entry-level card currently available from ATI. The fill-rate is superb, even if it is an older design.

I just picked up a 9600 Pro this morning. I honestly would have bought 9100 instead, but I couldn't find a local supplier, and I needed it today.

Robert Richmond
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 02:33 PM   #9 (permalink)
Guest
 
Darthgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,203
Darthgary is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Darthgary
9600 Pro is better for gaming.
Darthgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 03:18 PM   #10 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am not gamer. I need raw fill-rate and bandwidth, not aspects like pixel shaders and anistropic filtering. In my case, the 9100 would have likely performed within a few percent of the 9600, for nearly $100 less.

I have plenty of ATI cards sitting on shelves collecting dust, as the ATI OpenGL implementation leaves much to be desired. I am hoping the latest Catalyst drivers have addressed a few of the past problems, as I was hesitant to buy the 9600 in the first place.

Robert Richmond
  Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 AM.