»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Tech Support

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2003, 09:08 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Georgia
Posts: 137
Jüš† ä gü¥ is on a distinguished road
This is the type of person who impresses me

http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/...ny/teensy.html

How cool is that???

A guy who can make a program which will run on Linux and the program is only 45 bytes, INCLUDING header information/etc....

__________________
Jüš† ä €öm¶ù†Ê® §ÇÌÈñŒ mÅjÒ®
Jüš† ä gü¥ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2003, 09:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: TOO close to Wash DC
Posts: 7,956
vass0922 is on a distinguished road
funny considering smallest vb app is like 500k
__________________
<< Insert exceedingly large and overly verbose message of how 1337 you are here including full specs of every vehicle you've ever driven and PC you've owned >>
vass0922 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2003, 09:52 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Georgia
Posts: 137
Jüš† ä gü¥ is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by vass0922
funny considering smallest vb app is like 500k
Of course, if you want the absolute smallest program possible, that would be a DOS .com filetype program of 1 byte.

The byte would be 0x90, more commonly known as NOP.

I would not recommend running that program, though, as control would quickly pass from the NOP to the random bytes in memory after that/etc/etc, and you can have a fun time doing who knows what???
__________________
Jüš† ä €öm¶ù†Ê® §ÇÌÈñŒ mÅjÒ®
Jüš† ä gü¥ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2003, 10:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
ArcticFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wilsonville, OR
Posts: 2,220
ArcticFox is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to ArcticFox Send a message via MSN to ArcticFox Send a message via Yahoo to ArcticFox Send a message via Skype™ to ArcticFox
Well, the dude that wrote it has a point. Windows is a fat tub of lard compared with even the biggest Linux distro's, and that's probably why your framerate in games improves when you switch to the penguin .
ArcticFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2003, 10:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Siliconjunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,595
Siliconjunkie is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Siliconjunkie
Quote:
Originally posted by ArcticFox
Well, the dude that wrote it has a point. Windows is a fat tub of lard compared with even the biggest Linux distro's, and that's probably why your framerate in games improves when you switch to the penguin .
Hmmm, windows (any version but XP Media Center) 1 CD, RH is 3 for the install and then more for sources. I woudn't go as far as saying compared to the whole distro. A basic install, yes. But with real functionality they are comparable.

And, I couldnt see what the 45byte executable does. Does't really matter if it doesn't do anything.

Last edited by Siliconjunkie; 07-19-2003 at 10:54 PM.
Siliconjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2003, 11:18 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Scott Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,379
Scott Tiger is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by Siliconjunkie
Hmmm, windows (any version but XP Media Center) 1 CD, RH is 3 for the install and then more for sources. I woudn't go as far as saying compared to the whole distro. A basic install, yes. But with real functionality they are comparable.
No they're not really comparable - it's an apples to oranges comparision at best. You will get a lot more in the way of utilities and applications with a defualt install of am mainstream distro of Linux than you would with any version of Windows - no one could argue against that.

But as for Linux getting higher framerates in games than Windows.. well, that all depends on the game and what it was optimized for. This goes way beyond the type of operating system used. I'm all for Linux but statements like this are really misleading and will certainly cause disappointment among those who give Linux a try with the intention of raising thier framerates. I think I get about half the same framerate in RedHat that I do in XP when playing UT2003 @ 1280x1024.

edit: for readability
__________________
Registered Linux User: 288411
Licensed Windows XP User

Last edited by Scott Tiger; 07-19-2003 at 11:27 PM.
Scott Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2003, 11:59 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
ArcticFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wilsonville, OR
Posts: 2,220
ArcticFox is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to ArcticFox Send a message via MSN to ArcticFox Send a message via Yahoo to ArcticFox Send a message via Skype™ to ArcticFox
Well, what I meant was the overall slim-and-trim-ness of each OS. Windows takes up a whole CD by itself: and while Drake/RedHat etc have 2 (three for international support) CD's, they come with almost everything you need to do your stuff.
ArcticFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2003, 12:14 AM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
samwichse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sewanee, TN
Posts: 2,897
samwichse is on a distinguished road
Perhaps you should specify that GL games get better framerates?

In UT2003, it uses directx as the primary renderer in windows, with GL as a secondary (less optimized) option. So when you switch to linux, the only option you have is a poorer OpenGL implementation. The same goes for Serious Sam.

But, any Quake 3 based game designed for pure GL... mmm

Sam
samwichse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2003, 11:12 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Scott Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,379
Scott Tiger is on a distinguished road
Samwiches is right on the money with his explanation. OpenGL generally gives better performance in Linux than in Windows. So you can expect higher framerates in the Quake based games.

With most of the others.. no.
__________________
Registered Linux User: 288411
Licensed Windows XP User
Scott Tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2003, 11:21 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: TOO close to Wash DC
Posts: 7,956
vass0922 is on a distinguished road
SJ, it wasn't the fact that it was an executable that was really small. It was just that he made something that did SOMETHING at 45 bytes which is VERY small for any application (obviously considering the basic nature of it).

Obviously no sane person is going to go through a full scale application and try to optimize to that level.

Its just like climbing a mountain. Why in the world would anybody WANT to? Because they can

Its just impressive what a person can do with the right knowledge.

... and just a guy, come on.. at least his application did something lol
your app is like pointing to an address in C without the & lol
NEVER know what you'll get
__________________
<< Insert exceedingly large and overly verbose message of how 1337 you are here including full specs of every vehicle you've ever driven and PC you've owned >>
vass0922 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:57 AM.