»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Tech Support

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-27-2004, 11:16 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 16
Louch is on a distinguished road
is it Noob or Newb? best athlon to oc

Either way you put it I need help. I'm looking at building my first computer and I need a bit of help deciding on what to get. (AMD for sure, always had pentium systems might as well see how amd is) I've seen that AMD has just come out with the new 400fsb and the new nforce2 ultra400 to compensate. What I'm wondering is should I get one of these new chips (Barton3000+/3200+) or should I get one of the older 333 chips? The reason I ask is because I've also read that these athlon chips are reaching their limits and theres new 64 technology comeing out. Can an overclocker really push much if any more out of a 3000+ than they can say a 2500+? Also what core would you choose? Theres so many chips and I'm so freakin noobish that I had to ask, basicaly someone throw me a bone

Louch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 11:21 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,609
butch81385 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to butch81385
i go with noob

ive seen 2500 easily go to 3200 and above,

the question is, what are you looking for. most over clock would probably be a 2500, but a smaller overclock on a 3200 would be better than a larger overclock on a 2500 (understand?)

from what i hear, go with bartons either way though....

good luck (and im sure someone can fix all my mistakes in the next couple of posts as i am by no means an expert)
butch81385 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 11:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 16
Louch is on a distinguished road
the question is, what are you looking for

If you mean reliability..... Well the longer the better, but seeing as we're on the brink of another technology jump I'll just figure this computer will be a sacrafice to the cause of learning. I want to be able to fidget with every aspect of this computer and make it bow to my every whim

The thing I don't get is it looks like overclockers have been doing all the things that AMD is just now putting out and charging more for it (if that makes any sense) and maybe just makeing it more reliable. It's hard to say that cause AMD has kind of seamed geared towards overclockers so there must be some bonus beyond reliability to their upgrades or they wouldn't sell new chips.
Louch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 01:29 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 16
Louch is on a distinguished road
Ok axe all that, I've looked around a bit more and my head hurts even more.

What am I looking for?

A starting spot.

What cpu should I get? Theres so much info and so many different things out there, it's to much to take in. I'm more of a hands on person so I want a place to start then I'll learn as I go. I was thinking of getting an Asus or Abit mobo because they look to have the highest level of tinkerability.

One more question, Would an Athlon64 really be worth the extra? Is it's potential available to an overclocker?



>< smaller overclock on a 3200 would be better than a larger overclock on a 2500 (understand?)

Define better. I know clockspeed isn't everything, Would an overclocked 3200+ perform better than an overclocked 2500+.... Would it perform the same but more reliable or more stable.... my poor little head

Last edited by Louch; 04-27-2004 at 01:53 PM.
Louch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 02:11 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,609
butch81385 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to butch81385
what i am saying is that you can overclock a 2500 to 3200 speeds (thats 700 in amd's numbering). you can probably overclock a 3200- to about a 3400-3600 equivalent (200-400 increase in amd numbering). as you can see the 3200 -> 3600 is "faster" than the 2500 -> 3200. but the 2500 -> 3200 is a "bigger" and "better" overclock. so i would assume (note the word assume) that the overclocked 3200 WOULD perform better than the overclocked 2500 but the 2500 has better overclocking capabilities. (still confusing?). so for less money you can take a 2500 to 3200 speeds but MAYBE shorten the life. for more money you can have an overall faster processor (but not that much faster). so if you want the fastest with money as no object, OC the 3200, if you a fast one, but do have to pay bills, OC a 2500 (of course if you want to do the extremely crazy overclocks, you will be sinking a decent amount of money into cooling...)
butch81385 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 02:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 16
Louch is on a distinguished road
ohhh ok, sorry a bit low on sleep. The 2500 will get alot more percentage wise out of it than the 3200... getting deminishing returns. Ok thanks, I think I'll read a bit more before I open my mouth again
Louch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 06:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 954
RamonGTP is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to RamonGTP Send a message via Yahoo to RamonGTP
Get a mobile 2500+ or 2600+

It will overclock higher than any non-mobile bartons.
RamonGTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 09:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 16
Louch is on a distinguished road
I read an article linked from here about that whole mobile business and that just confused me even more. It looked to me like the way to unlock an athlon xp is to make it look like a mobile athlon xp. But the part that confused me (other than most of it) is what the difference between a mobile athlon xp (I think thats faked mobile) and an athlon mp (true mobile athlon I think). Well another question... considering I get a mobile cpu should I still get the abit or asus board that can support 400fsb? Seams worth the $20-30 difference to have the option of trying to push the mobile chip as far as possible. I guess end performance isn't what I'm looking for but how I get to the performance that I get that counts.

A side note: Components that I all ready have are ATI Raedon AIW 9600pro; Western Digital ultra ata/100 120gb and 200gb hd's

Last edited by Louch; 04-27-2004 at 09:26 PM.
Louch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 09:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
teengeek88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NW burbs of Chicago
Posts: 538
teengeek88 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to teengeek88 Send a message via Yahoo to teengeek88
Quote:
Well another question... considering I get a mobile cpu should I still get the abit or asus board that can support 400fsb? Seams worth the $20-30 difference to have to option of trying to push the mobile chip as far as possible. I guess end performance isn't what I'm looking for but how I get to the performance that I get that counts.
Definitley. EIther way, its still more upgradable for the future. since this is your first real excursion into overclocking and such, I would get a 2500+. Its pretty cheap nowadays, so just incase u make a mistake, you dont lose a $180 processor as opposed to losing a $80 processor. I would spend the extra $100 on getting good overclocking RAM. I would be able to OC alot better if i had better RAM, and its something I regret not upgrading.

good luck with everything, and Welcome to TechIMO, i dont think ive ever seen you around here!
teengeek88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2004, 09:36 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 16
Louch is on a distinguished road
That was yet another question RAM ^.^ The mobo's say that they support a max of pc3200, would it be worth buying something faster than that? And the issue of one of the two boards says it'll support 3 sticks of 1gig at 333fsb or two sticks of 1gig at 400fsb..... yeah I don't understand ram yet either. Not that I want to spring on 3gigs of ram anyways but what would be a good choice for ram? Out of the three what would be the first bottle neck to be replaced in say a year? Mobile 2500+ cpu mobo or pc3200 ram?

good luck with everything, and Welcome to TechIMO, i dont think ive ever seen you around here!

Thanks, I've lurked around a bit every time the thought of building a computer came up then dissapeared for a while to let the info sink in/fade away. Decided to post cause it looks like the funds are a go this time ^-^
Louch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 PM.