 | |
04-11-2004, 06:09 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 63
| » 
stupid mouse question
yeah, so I've got a mouse that can do both PS/2 and USB, is there any reason to use the USB-2.0 port over the PS2 :P? I know that USB is a much bus, but will it really matter with a mouse?
|
| |
04-11-2004, 06:17 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: South Jersey
Posts: 3,081
|
I've often asked myself that question, Why the USB mouse when there is a port specifically designed to accomodate the critter? Of course, the point is that it makes no difference, so why tie up a USB port.
|
| |
04-11-2004, 06:41 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Kansas City, Mo.
Posts: 558
|
I heard that they are going to phase out the ps/2 prots
|
| |
04-11-2004, 06:59 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Da Bronx, NY
Posts: 1,709
| Quote: Originally posted by osprey4 I've often asked myself that question, Why the USB mouse when there is a port specifically designed to accomodate the critter? Of course, the point is that it makes no difference, so why tie up a USB port. |
Dittto............
|
| |
04-11-2004, 07:01 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Gateshead U.K.
Posts: 482
|
like osprey says, mate. it's probably better to keep your mouse and keyboard on the ps/2 connectors, as it doesn't just keep the usb ports free for other items, the usb system only has a certain amount of bandwidth (and supply voltage without powered hubs and self powered devices) to share between all devices on the bus. fair enough, you can put 127 devices on the bus, but try using them once bandwidth contention kicks in.  just saying that just because you CAN do it, doesn't mean it's better or compulsory.
|
| |
04-11-2004, 11:44 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 714
|
Not a stupid question at all. Since I have a ps2 keyboard and an usb mouse with ps2 adapter I decided not to turn on the usb ports. Even my printer have usb but I'm using the parallel port. Saved a lot of resources that way.
\o/ Billy
|
| |
04-11-2004, 12:17 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: inside the Beltway, outside the loop
Posts: 1,067
|
Actually, there is one reason to use the USB connector: If your mouse comes unplugged from the PS/2 connector, you have to reboot before it'll work again.
That said, I still don't tie up one of my USB ports with a mouse...
|
| |
04-11-2004, 01:07 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 634
|
I use a track ball. I installed it both ps2 and USB. There's no
difference in performance. It's ps2 at the moment.
__________________
Bob D.
|
| |
04-11-2004, 02:23 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Healdsburg, CA
Posts: 3,157
|
I've found that my Intellimouse Explorer 3.0 reacts smoother and quicker attached to the USB port. Besides, I have four USB ports available, so no worries there. |
| |
04-11-2004, 02:40 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Bay Area, CA USA
Posts: 6,966
|
USB port allows a mouse or trackball or whatever to operate with refresh frequency of 125hz. That makes for smooth movement of mouse pointer.
The PS/2 port however is capable of running the mouse with a refresh frequency up to 200hz, even smoother than USB, although probably not very noticable to most people. But if you're a gamer, then it may very well be noticable.
If you want to check your mouse's refresh rate there is a little gizmo called Mourserate that will tell you.
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Most Active Discussions  | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |