»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Tech Support

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2004, 09:44 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC in the US
Posts: 3,732
Redwolf is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Redwolf Send a message via AIM to Redwolf Send a message via Yahoo to Redwolf
Strange: Can't mount a certain FAT32 partition

Okay, before I start I might want to show you the current hard drive structure I have:

/dev/hda <-Linux Hard Drive
->/dev/hda1 <-/boot
->/dev/hda2 <-swap
->/dev/hda3 <-root

/dev/hde <-Windows Hard Drive
->/dev/hde1

/dev/hdf <-80G Misc hard drive
->/dev/hdf1 <-Stuff 1
->/dev/hdf2 <-Extended partition
-->/dev/hdf5 <-Stuff2

Okay, with that knowledge, here is the problem. I cannot mount /dev/hdf5. I can mount /dev/hdf1 and /dev/hde1. Here's the really wierd thing.

I can run fsck.vfat on /dev/hdf5. With no problems.

But when I try to mount, I get this pretty little message:

Code:
redwolf@wolf redwolf $ mount /fat-stuff2
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdf5,
       or too many mounted file systems
redwolf@wolf redwolf $
Wonderful, isn't it. Lets eliminate some options.

It's not the wrong fs type. As I mentioned, fsck.vfat runs file on it. All partitions on /dev/hdf are FAT32.

It's not too many mounted filesystems either. Right after I get this message I can mount /dev/hdf1 no problems.

It's definately not a bad superblock. I ran fsck.vfat on full surface scan overnight. No problems detected other than improper free space reported, which still didn't help after fixing that. I can open the drive just fine in Windows too.

So it has to be a bad option somewhere. Hmm...maybe being a logical partition is throwing it off somehow. I've never had a logical partition fail to mount though. Here is my fstab, just in case:

Code:
# <fs>          	<mountpoint>    <type>  	<opts>      		<dump/pass>

# NOTE: If your BOOT partition is ReiserFS, add the notail option to opts.
/dev/hda1		/boot		ext2		noauto,noatime		1 1
/dev/hda3		/		xfs		noatime			0 0
/dev/hda2		none		swap		sw			0 0
/dev/cdroms/cdrom0	/mnt/cdrom	iso9660		noauto,ro		0 0
/dev/fd0		/mnt/floppy	auto		noauto			0 0
/dev/hde1 		/fat-windwos    vfat		noauto,rw		0 0
/dev/hdf1		/fat-stuff1	vfat		noauto,rw,user,gid=800		0 0
/dev/hdf5		/fat-stuff2     vfat		noauto,rw,user,gid=800		0 0

# NOTE: The next line is critical for boot!
none			/proc		proc		defaults		0 0

# glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
# POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). 
# (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will
#  use almost no memory if not populated with files)
# Adding the following line to /etc/fstab should take care of this:

none			/dev/shm	tmpfs		defaults		0 0
I'm stumped. I'm running Gentoo (switched back cuz I love it ) installed from stage 1. Just in case, options are -02, -march=athlon-xp and -pipe in make.conf.

Can somebody help me? Please

Redwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2004, 10:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
lynchmob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 1,361
lynchmob is on a distinguished road
Af the end of the hdf5 line, did you type a carriage return?
You'll get that message if not...I think.
lynch
__________________
Seldom right,but never in doubt...
lynchmob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2004, 10:23 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC in the US
Posts: 3,732
Redwolf is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Redwolf Send a message via AIM to Redwolf Send a message via Yahoo to Redwolf
Yep. There is a carriage return at the end of that line.
Redwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2004, 11:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
krohnjw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ~/
Posts: 2,567
krohnjw is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to krohnjw
What does mtab show?
krohnjw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2004, 04:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC in the US
Posts: 3,732
Redwolf is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Redwolf Send a message via AIM to Redwolf Send a message via Yahoo to Redwolf
Code:
/dev/hda3 / xfs rw,noatime 0 0
/dev/hda3 / ext3 rw,noatime 0 0
none /proc proc rw 0 0
none /sys sysfs rw 0 0
none /dev devfs rw 0 0
none /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0
none /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw 0 0
/dev/hdf1 /fat-stuff1 vfat rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,gid=800,user=redwolf 0 0
Hmmm...the mtab looks a little, screwy....
Redwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 02:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC in the US
Posts: 3,732
Redwolf is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Redwolf Send a message via AIM to Redwolf Send a message via Yahoo to Redwolf
-bump-
Redwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2004, 10:58 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
krohnjw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ~/
Posts: 2,567
krohnjw is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to krohnjw
What filesystem is /dev/hda3?
krohnjw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2004, 08:13 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC in the US
Posts: 3,732
Redwolf is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Redwolf Send a message via AIM to Redwolf Send a message via Yahoo to Redwolf
All the drives on HDA are ext3 except for the swap (of course).
Redwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2004, 06:46 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
nukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 2,946
nukes is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to nukes Send a message via Yahoo to nukes
Code:
/dev/hda3		/		xfs		noatime			0 0
That could be a problem if its ext3.
Is there a reason for using an extended partition for /dev/hdf5?
I've had this problem before, but the filesystem was corrupted. What version of baselayout are you using?
__________________
_____
NuKeS
nukes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2004, 03:41 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NC in the US
Posts: 3,732
Redwolf is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Redwolf Send a message via AIM to Redwolf Send a message via Yahoo to Redwolf
I'm using extended partitions because I partitioned the drive with Windows FDISK, which forces you to create an extended partition for more than one partition. I don't know about baselayout yet, but I'll be checking it out in a few.

okay, I'm using baselayout 1.8.6.13, the latest on the portage tree (until I resynce probably ).

Last edited by Redwolf; 03-11-2004 at 03:49 PM.
Redwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM.