»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Off Topic Community

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2004, 01:20 AM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
wallie_x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 146
wallie_x is on a distinguished road
Former Aide in Memo Leak Seeks Probe of Democrats for Corruption.

Fox News:

Quote:
WASHINGTON — A top Senate attorney who resigned under pressure this month following a controversial leak inquiry says he will continue to bring attention to the Democratic memos at the heart of the investigation despite focus on the questionable acquisition of the documents.
Manuel Miranda, who worked for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, has filed a complaint with the Senate Ethics Committee charging that hundreds of damning memos currently in the hands of investigators prove serious public corruption by Democratic senators and their aides.
No, you won't find such potentially damaging stuff at CNN or CBS.

Moreover, I seriously doubt this is going to go away anytime soon. The contents of those memos shows just how corrupt facets of our political system have become... and yes, it's not just the Democrats either.


Democratic Senate Judiciary Corruption

wallie_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 04:20 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 0
whitebeard21 is on a distinguished road
Why don't you tell the truth wallie Miranda was suspended for ollegally acessing computer files. He should have been fired and jailed. All of this much spun and incomplete reporting by faux is just another republican dirty trick ala nixon.

This administrations answer when they get caught with their hand in the cookie jar is to say "I was just counting them".
whitebeard21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 06:00 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
So white beard you would shoot the messenger? At least as long as he illegally acquired the information no matter the content you would ignore it?

AFAIAC any memo's written on government computers or sent to goverment officials should be public knowledge. All except for state secrets.

I mean after all why not?
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 06:45 AM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 0
whitebeard21 is on a distinguished road
Epi your reply is ridiculous because violations of the law should be prosecuted. There is evidence he did release state secrets.

Go down to your local court house and tell them you want acess to their network and see how long it takes them to baker act you.
whitebeard21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 06:56 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
So in a sense you feel anything that is leaked should be surpressed as it was illegally acquired?
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 07:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
nomaxim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Stow, Ohio, Sol III
Posts: 2,211
nomaxim is on a distinguished road
Epi, sounds like a Nixon move there.

Oh wait, Nixon is now thought to be a great pres.

Me Bad!

???? What does that mean?
__________________
Well, if crime fighters fight crime and fire fighters fight fire, what do freedom fighters fight? They never mention that part to us, do they?
-George Carlin
nomaxim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 07:42 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
I am not saying this person should not be punished for stealing documents against the policies of the DNC.

But the question remains should the information be used to punish wrong doing.

is the interaction between special interests funding kennedy's campaigns and his blocking of judicial nominees germane to the evaluatin of Kennedy. Sounds like a little quid pro quo there.

Now I do not know all the stuff in these memo's and it might be alot to do about nothing. But assuming the worst, nepatism, quid pro quo, and such. Should the information be surpressed or used against the democrats as well as punishing the leak.

Should leaked information always be surpressed? If not when should it be surpressed and when should it be used?
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 09:55 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 0
whitebeard21 is on a distinguished road
No ilegally obtained informatio may be used in a court of law.
I know this goes against what ashcroft and His mentor hitler believe but right now it is the law.
whitebeard21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 10:48 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
Evidentiary rules used in congress and congressional probes are not subject to the same rules as your local civil court.

Also the information was on government property. payed for in wages of those who wrote them on government time.

I do not support going into kennedys house and ripping out his hard drive to find out if it has anything dirty on it.

But if a government server has his dirt on it then tough luck.


[rant on] I love stupid exaggeration and morinic associations linking people to hitler because they do not believe what you do.

It is as if people have no idea what hitler and the Nazis did

"Oh you are for the death penalty you big stupid hitler"

"did you hear what the principle did he said we can't play music loud in the parkinglot What a NAZI!"
Get real
What I would like to ask all the hitler comparitors is, tell me how your life has been deminished by hitler (I mean) ashcroft. Tell me how you fear for your life. Tell me how ashcroft has broken into your house because you are a jew and burned down your resturant. Tell me how ashcroft has made you wear a star of david and tatooed you with a number. The complete absurdity of the comparison is rediculous.

Just because you follow something an evil dictator did does not mean you are on the same path. Saddam gave to the poor, Oh horror we should stop that right now. Saddam was for security perhaps not for all but for a select few. So we should eliminate all security measures because both hitler and saddam were for security.

You know what hitler also ate chicken, OMG we need to stop all people from eating chicken it will make us into NAZI's[/rant off]
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2004, 10:54 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In a Cali Valley
Posts: 7,817
Mike is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Mike
Well, The USA PATRIOT Act is a bit too shady.
Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 AM.