Saddam Capture Drives Dems, Lefties & Media Mad

[wallie_x]

The hypocrisy and inconsistency shows the bent of the leftist’s and left leaning media, whose perception of reality breathes only one thing: trying to portray GWB in a bad light even in obvious victory.

On the duplicity of H.Dean:

The former Vermont governor followed this intellectual inconsistency with a schizophrenic assertion that: “The capture of Saddam is a good thing which I hope very much will help keep our soldiers safer. But the capture of Saddam has not made America safer.” How America could be no safer with the Butcher of Baghdad behind bars was not explained.

HERE!

[originel]

i fail to see the significance of this article. He talkes about saddam's capture in a very objective manner (kudos for him on that), but then goes to say that the "loopy leftist rhetoric" is all nonsense without backing it up. He starts out very informative and then switches to talking about how bad the left media is without much warning and didn't back anything up, just merely made assertations.

Now i'm not going to say that the left media isn't spinning things some as of late, but i don't see that as a good article to prove it.

Also keep in mind that there is just as much righ leaning propoganda as there is from the left. To talk about the "hypocrisy and inconsistency" of one without mentioning the other is, well, hypocritical and inconsistent.

[Mike]

I seriously think you need to get a hobby.

[Bill in SD, CA]

Originally posted by Mike
I seriously think you need to get a hobby.

Dare I ask who?

Let Dean take all the rope he needs.

In the end he will supply his own tree.



Bill

[brandon184]

.. I think this is his hobby.

I'm not sure what kind of response you're looking for, wallie. Links to insane FOX News articles aren't uncommon around here.

- Brandon

[cyphen]

Originally posted by brandon184
IMO, Howard Dean is a dolt. And that's coming from someone who you would automatically suspect to be a Dean fanatic. (hint, hint Wallie...) But that doesn't change the fact that the Bush administration shouldn't be spreading the idea that terrorism has taken a devastating blow now that Saddam has been captured. You know... because Saddam was responsible for 9/11, and all...
- Brandon

who exactly is spreading that idea, brandon. Of all the sources i've seen, the only reference to this has been, well... you.

[Chuckiechan]

I think what some of you are missing is the fact the certain leaders, Saddam included were willing to look the other way while terrorists trained and based in their countries. Saddam was paying the families of Hamas suicide bombers money for killing innocents. Even though that was in Israel, he has still violated America's sense of decency. That is reason enough to get rid of him.

As these folks begin to fall, more moderate leaders are taking over because we demand an end to fanatics in high places. The terrorists will eventually be driven back under the rock they came from until, as usual, we lose our resolve for political reasons.

[brandon184]

who exactly is spreading that idea, brandon. Of all the sources i've seen, the only reference to this has been, well... you.

What sources HAVE you seen? For someone who has done so much research, I find it interesting that you cannot even construct a grammatically correct sentence.

Well, someone is spreading it. I'd love to be able to say that I have influence over 100+ million folk, but the fact of the matter remains that probably about half of Americans think that Saddam was involved with Sept. 11th..

Osama and Saddam are/were anything but "aligned"... Believe it or not.

I think what some of you are missing is the fact the certain leaders, Saddam included were willing to look the other way while terrorists trained and based in their countries.

Like America?... As far as I can recall, the terrorists who carried out the Sept. 11th attacks recieved their flight training WITHIN the USA!

- Brandon

[Mr. Goodbytes]

Like America?... As far as I can recall, the terrorists who carried out the Sept. 11th attacks recieved their flight training WITHIN the USA!

Could you have come up with a more blatently false analogy?? The difference here is those vermin (people is too good a word for them) we allowed to train because it was thought to be a law-abiding career they were training for. However, Saddam's regime operated (or allowed others to operate) the Salman Pak terrorist training facility which had a grounded Boeing which was most likely used to train terrorists how to hijack planes seeing as how you can't learn how to fly using a plane that can't fly.

[brandon184]

The difference here is those vermin (people is too good a word for them) we allowed to train because it was thought to be a law-abiding career they were training for.

.. yet you have intelligence information dating back to the early 90's saying that planes could be used in a terrorist attack.

The "we hadn't the slightest idea!" stuff stopped flying a long time ago.

Oh yes... I apologize if I misstated what I said as being an analogy. It was intended to be taken as what it is --- fact.

- Brandon