»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Off Topic Community

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2003, 08:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
RayH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 480
RayH is on a distinguished road
Halliburton, War Profiteer

So the overcharge in petro was because of the Kuwaitis, eh? What's the matter? Halliburton is going to do billion dollar businesses and not know the going rate for petro in the Middle East? It sounds fishy to me! I think if people dig just a bit deeper, there's going to be found KICKBACKS coming out of Kuwait!

__________________
RayH424@Hotmail.com
Please indicate you are from TechIMO in subject line so you don't get deleted as spam :)
RayH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 01:55 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3
Max50 is on a distinguished road
Who specifically would/will receive the kickback? How will/would the kickback be admiistered?

The reality is there is/was price hedging that rewarded private owners who subcontracted with Hal.

Gouging is not a new experience for the US consumer and it doesn't involve kickbacks.

The problem is Hal did not bid for the contract, and as a consequence Hal is not especially motivated to keep down costs.
Max50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 04:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
pickel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Jackson,MS
Posts: 1,941
pickel is on a distinguished road
The whole Iraq senerio is about OIL. How many times do we have to tell you people. ??????? Think outside of the box for once in your lives.
__________________
Damn the torpedos, full speed ahead
pickel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 04:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Knothead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: South Bay, CA
Posts: 600
Knothead is on a distinguished road
Ya know what? I don't believe it was ever about oil (per se---sure, we'll likely get a really good price on Iraqi oil from here out, BUT...) and we can speculate all we want.

Here's some things that we know for sure:

Halliburton is Vice President Cheney's company... yeah, I know, he's "retired" or "sold his shares" or <insert your own legalese> but...come on!

Halliburton did not bid for the $10 BILLION dollar contract.... there are other companies with the same capabilities as Halliburton; Hal isn't unique. You know how they found out about this deal?

In the newspaper. Like us. It was a done deal before the first carrier left for the Mediterranian.

This suggests to me that the new "growth industry" for the 21st century will be the rebuilding of shattered countries by the U.S.!

Gee, no WMD's? Well whattya know! Could it possibly be that the good ol' boys (in the White House) might have had something else on their minds when they involved America in this war?

I mean, Ten billion bucks ain't hay!
Knothead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2003, 09:26 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3
Max50 is on a distinguished road
Halliburton is a corporation and owned by stockholders and profits or losses are reflected in the EPS and may or may not be refelected in the price of stock. Cheney was a stockholder and sold his holdings prior to any Halliburton contract in question. Financial statements of govt. contracts are closely audited and there was no attempt to hide transactions!!! How can kickbacks be concealed? Money transactions are closely monitored by the banking system and any money transactions would require money laundering and a network of conspiracy to commit fraud against the govt.

People who believe the war against terrorism is entirely due to oil are people who do not understand socio/econ from a large picture perspective and therefore have tunnel vision enhanced by self-serving propraganda and political agendas. They are the people who are in a box.
Max50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2003, 09:34 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
Was it not the subcontractor who was charging the large sum of money...

how did halliburton profit?

How much would you charge to truck in fuel for the military during an active conflict? Do you not charge more for risk?

I do not know if that is factored into the reporting on this. If it was unreasonable then hang em. But if this was a contract which said we are charging extra due to risks in manpower and machines then tough.
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2003, 09:43 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Omardeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sacramento ,ca
Posts: 3,176
Omardeth is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Omardeth Send a message via Yahoo to Omardeth
it wasn't a subcontractor . hal owns the company that is being charged with the over charges . i think the name of the company is brown and something , not sure of it off the top of my head . it is like disney , they own abc and espn . hal will make money off this .
Omardeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2003, 10:36 AM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Theophylact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: inside the Beltway, outside the loop
Posts: 1,067
Theophylact is on a distinguished road
Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Halliburton.
Theophylact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2003, 10:42 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
J-Excel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kzoo, MI
Posts: 820
J-Excel is on a distinguished road
But didn't Kellogg, Brown and Root use a subcontractor, who overcharged them? And isn't Halliburton reimbursing the government for the overcharge that they should have negotiated better terms for?

My question is why wasn't an Iraqi company allowed to provide this service? They could have negotiated a much better price, and the profit would have stayed in Iraq.

Last edited by J-Excel; 12-15-2003 at 11:40 AM.
J-Excel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2003, 11:54 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
osprey4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 3,081
osprey4 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by J-Excel
My question is why wasn't an Iraqi company allowed to provide this service? They could have negotiated a much better price, and the profit would have stayed in Iraq.
Iraq ain't making any gasoline the last I checked.
osprey4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 AM.