»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Off Topic Community

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2003, 11:55 AM   #1 (permalink)
Contributing Editor
 
tony_j15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CJ,MO:REBEL Base
Posts: 2,169
tony_j15 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to tony_j15 Send a message via AIM to tony_j15
Democrats support action against Iraq

At least they did when Clinton was in charge!

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
since 1983." S
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs."
- Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John
Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a
licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
the United
States and our allies."
- Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others,
December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction
and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do" Rep.
- Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weap ons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real
..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


And now they expect us to believe that we made a horrible mistake and that there are no WMD's? Spinless creeps!

tony_j15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
According to shahani all those democrats are Liars.

Lets assume that there were no WMD post 1998. That means that all those democrats (including Gore the person they wanted in power) were lying.

Personally my take on it would be at worst bad information at best still yet to be found or were destroyed recently.
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
M_Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Urbana, Illinois
Posts: 1,845
M_Six is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Spinless creeps!
Spinless? Hardly. The Dems are just as good at spinning as anyone.
__________________
Mark}--->8-8->
If you're not the lead dog, the scenery never changes.
M_Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
wallie_x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 146
wallie_x is on a distinguished road
M_Six sez:
Quote:
The Dems are just as good at spinning as anyone.
Good??
How about the undisputed champions of .......
wallie_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In a Cali Valley
Posts: 7,817
Mike is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Mike
Old news.... Right wingers posted that months ago. You're just a little bit behind.

Have to try and keep up with the spinless creeps...
Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:32 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Posts: 20
MTAtech is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to MTAtech Send a message via Yahoo to MTAtech
IT IS AMAZING WHAT SOMEONE CAN BE SAID TO HAVE SAID WHEN SOMEONE TAKES WHAT THEY HAVE SAID OUT OF CONTEXT, TRUNCATES PORTION, ETC. Liars like Bill O'Reilly do it all the time and it is sickening.

In each of these statements the compiler of these quotes mischieviously sniped portions of the full text to fool the reader. These quotes, when edited carefully, give the impression that the speaker was favoring military action against Iraq. However, when you read the full text, the speaker was saying the exact opposite. This is the worst kind of dishonestly.

FOR THE TRUTH OF WHAT THESE PEOPLE FULLY SAID, CLICK HERE:
http://snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

Examples:
Yesterday, Clinton reiterated that he would prefer a "diplomatic solution" to the standoff with Iraq but added, "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." Clinton met with Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright, just back from a trip to Europe and several Arab countries to outline the U.S. position, and is to discuss Iraq with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who arrived in Washington yesterday.
===============================
We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction. Our intelligence community is also deeply concerned about the acquisition of such weapons by Iran, North Korea, Libya, Syria and other nations. But information from the intelligence community over the past six months does not point to Iraq as an imminent threat to the United States or a major proliferator of weapons of mass destruction. -Ted Kennedy

Sounds very different when one reads a larger portion (this isn't the whole thing). The neocons have become masters at deceiving this way.
__________________
MTAtech - 'Fare and Balanced'

Last edited by MTAtech; 11-10-2003 at 01:07 PM.
MTAtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
Contributing Editor
 
tony_j15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CJ,MO:REBEL Base
Posts: 2,169
tony_j15 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to tony_j15 Send a message via AIM to tony_j15
I like to verify my info before i post it. So yes, i guess im a bit behind.
tony_j15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Droppyale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: -----------
Posts: 1,798
Droppyale is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Droppyale Send a message via Yahoo to Droppyale
lol
Droppyale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:37 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
Old news but true.

Gore is touting how there were no WMD. Yet was saying he knew they were there.

Clinton said after the conflict started that bush made a fair decision.

Yet clinton and gore are saying how bush lied and mislead and...

interesting how the news does not take query the democrats on some of this.

MR senator (Kennedy), How is it that you said on Sept. 27, 2002 ""We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 12:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In a Cali Valley
Posts: 7,817
Mike is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Mike
Quote:
Originally posted by tony_j15
I like to verify my info before i post it. So yes, i guess im a bit behind.
As do many of the people around here, it was still shown a while back.
Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 AM.