Or something like that:
My Co-Workers were talking about how in the news it said this old guy about 86yrs old plowed his car into a market and killed like 9 people and injuring more. Of course the 1/2 empty pessimistic guy (me) comes in saying that yeah, it is his fault, and yes, if you kill 9 and injure about 45 people regardless of your age or the situation you should rot in jail till you croak.
They said I saw things from a very "Black and White" Standpoint/Perspective.....yeah I sure do. It's either yes or no, not maybe. "Maybe" it was an accident, Maybe, he just forgot where the brake was and his foot slipped after 86 years of driving….Maybe he was even in the process of having a heart attack…..it doesn’t frickin matter. He Killed 8+ people…..that’s what matters. Those people will never live to see 86, that 4yr old little girl will never live that old, why? Because some old guy was having a seizure in his Buick and ended her life….that’s how I see it. Not how he did it or why, but the fact that he did it and it’s done.
The old dude should spend the rest of his life in jail whether his actions were involuntary or not. Those people don’t have a chance to live the rest of their lives the way they want to, nor should he.
I know a lot of you will disagree with me but I believe in a yes/no, eye4eye perspective. You kill somebody, accident or not, unless in vital self defense you should suffer the same fate as the victim. Maybe I’m overly pessimistic and 1 sided, but there are too many loopholes and ways to work around the system to let a middleman in the picture. You go on a rampage, kill 15 people, claim temporary insanity, get 5-15 years in jail, 5 years probation and live the rest of yer life….slight exaggeration but you can see my point whether you agree or not.
This is open for debate because I want to hear other perspectives…..**goes away fuming**
Here’s some linkage a co-worker just gave to me:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/sto...9p-91926c.html