So now we know:

[Theophylact]

Weapons of mass destruction were never the reason for invading Iraq.

"We were not lying," said one official. "But it was just a matter of emphasis."

Depends on what the meaning of "lying" is, I suppose.

[goldenbuddha]

Well if they really wanted to they could easily have "found" said weapons of mass destruction.

[Theophylact]

Just wait a bit; they'll "find" some. But they're busy right now, shooting protesters, arranging cease-fires with terrorists, and so forth...

[caddmannq]

Don't matter to most of us. After 9/11 we just wanted to "smoke" some Arabs.

[Max50]

I predict WMD will be found within the next month! Then I predict there will be people who will claim WMD were US planted! Personally, I couldn't care less one way or the other.

I want to see terrorism minimized, and the world and the US economy move forward in a positive growth pattern that will benefit the US and allies. France chose the wrong side, and I believe the road map for prosperity and peace is on course.

Nay sayers said if a war was brought against Iraq there would be mass destruction again on American soil. There would be mass recruitment for terrorism. The war would cause an economic disaster and mulitude of American lives would be lost in a bogged down war that would not end decisively.

The right decision was made. Saddam had to go, and Iraq will be better for it. Additionally, there is a better opportunity to stablize the region. That is the challenge faced for people who believe in freedom.

[cracked]

Originally posted by Max50
I predict WMD will be found within the next month! Then I predict there will be people who will claim WMD were US planted! Personally, I couldn't care less one way or the other.

same here.

drew

Well, we declared war on terror, and that government was a government of terror, plain and simple.