Potential for possible positive on preliminary WMD test!!!!

[Gomer]

This just in....
WMD'S..... maybe
Potential WMD site possibly discovered!! Preliminary evidence indicates WMD's might have exisited some time in the past!! A precursory test done in the field suggests that it was indeed chemicals. Some of these chemicals may well have been stored in 50 gallon drums. This is speculation, but if these are actual WMD's, they could be very dangerous. If all of this turns out to be true, this perhaps is the probable "smoking gun."

Stay tuned, we will provide more conjecture as the situation developes or every fifteen minutes... whichever comes first!!!!

[J-Excel]

I hope they do find verified, non-planted
Your comment was deleted.
Please remember,

Threads regarding sensitive topics sometimes get heated, however, members are still expected to remain composed and respectful, even in topics they are passionate about.

Continuing to break this rule will result in you loosing your community privileges.

surreal

[Epidemic]

Posting material outside the stated topic (also known as thread crapping) is not permitted. Any message that distracts from the stated topic or causes the discussion to go off-topic should be avoided or ignored. Such messages are subject to removal.
Yours has been removed.

surreal

[Gomer]

What The Fooey are you rambling about... This is possibly an important thread regarding supposed WMD's

[Urban_Squrill]

Originally posted by J-Excel
I hope they do find verified, non-planted WMDs soon.

You said it.

And so did you and it was an inappropriate remark so,
Your comment was deleted.
Please remember,

Threads regarding sensitive topics sometimes get heated, however, members are still expected to remain composed and respectful, even in topics they are passionate about.

Continuing to break this rule will result in you loosing your community privileges.

Surreal

[Hawkeye]

you talkin about the possible insecticide/chemical weapons?
How can you confuse insecticide with chemical weapons anyway?
If he had them could you please inform me why he would not use them in the first place?
And now for my final thought:
I'm pretty sure it was proven I raq had chemical weapons in the past, during the iraq/iran war so just because they were there before does not mean that they're newer.

-HawkeyE-

[Mike]

Weren't they supposed to destroy these weapons of theirs? They apparently started hiding them..
Ahh well, whatever.

[dmanlyr]

J-Excel, I one again take offense at your statment about the "anti war people shutting up" I am neither anti war nor for this paticular war, therefore, I 100% support each of us to our own opinion! (but not telling each other they are wrong in thinking one way or forcing my own opinion down anothers throat)

Once again, each of us FREE AMERICANS are free to voice their own opinion, and more, also HAVE their own opinon. Please vacate this great country of our if you cannot see your way clear to support the constitution and the bill of rights.

Thank you, David

[J-Excel]

Right back at you in your own words...

I one again take offense at your statment about trying to take away my right to protest the protestors.

Once again, each of us FREE AMERICANS are free to voice their own opinion, and more, also HAVE their own opinon. Please vacate this great country of our if you cannot see your way clear to support the constitution and the bill of rights.

[italics are my changes]

[Chuckiechan]

If Saddam was bluffing should we give him back his country? Or at least his next of kin?

EDIT: I have a problem with the protest industry. Especially the ones trying to shut down highways in cities, and trying to block people from going to and from work. These people will never go away, they need to sent away!