For now, Fission is powerful, cheap, and relatively safe (except for the occasional catastrophic nuclear meltdown, which is a bit less than safe). Until we get Fusion or other renewable sources of energy, we'll have to use at least some fission. Fossil Fuels can't provide the world forever (something America needs to learn) and solar and wind power are too unreliable except in a few places where it is continuous. Upper atmosphere wind generators would be a great source of reiable energy, when it is perfected. Hydroelectricity is the best method except that it is incredibly expesnive, and requires a river to turn into a lake and possible destroy some towns along the way. Microwave energy has been discussed, but it may cause cancer (bad) and mistargeting could be inresting (although I doubt it).
I'm not COMPLETELY for fission though. It has to have proiven safe designs and the reactors have to be built in ways that put tanks to shame. We have to protect the reactors from all kinds of problems, like bad weather, fault lines, terrorist attacks, and human error and equipment failure. PWR reactors so far have been the safest (it is said that had Three Mile Island not been a PWR design, it would have been bigger than Chreynobyl). Waste disposal would have to be a big priority (however, nuke reactors only account for 5-10% of all the nuclear waste. The rest is from nuclear missiles, which are a b**** to maintain).
Realise there are things reactors are good for besides power. Breeder Reactors (ones that can make materials radioactive) have many uses nowadays, from the tritium that lights up the hands on your glow-in-the-dark watch to the cobalt that helps doctors fight cancer.
http://www.iaea.or.at/worldatom/Pres...sp1996n15.html
Technology is not inheriently good or evil. The technology that could have exterminated humanity can help to save it. The technologies of cloning and molecular biology have many uses outside of the evils that come to mind (imagine a benign virus that infects only cancer cells...)