»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Off Topic Community

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2003, 09:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
Does the Constitution protect non citizens?

I often hear complaints of civil liberties these days. I am just wondering if the words of the constitution actually say that they apply to non citizens.

Excluding torture and unjust imprisonment...

Do you and should you have the same freedom of movement speech, attorney as americans according to the constitution?

If America requests that a non citizen leave the country because we do not like their politics is it legal to expel them? In clear verbage not liberal or conservative court rulings.

Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 09:53 AM   #2 (permalink)
shahani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No, the Constitution applies only for domestic peeps.

Any non-citizen peep can be expelled. A citizen peep if found traitor can be expelled to Jupiter. Unless Iraq agrees to take him.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 09:57 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
daveleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: KBAD-Bossier City LA
Posts: 7,487
daveleau is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to daveleau Send a message via AIM to daveleau Send a message via Yahoo to daveleau
to non-citizens outside the US? No. It would be nice if every country had a basis for rights that the Bill of Rights has, but that is a pipe dream.

To non-citizens inside the US? Yes. Note that if they are "invaders" their rights of Habeus Corpus can be removed.

As per your last question, I have never really heard of this happening. Our freedom of speech applies to everyone on US soil, as is seen in us not expelling foreign dignitaries whose policies we do not agree with. For instance, you remember that Saudi Prince that wanted to give NYC millions of $$s after 9/11, but began talking of how the US was to blame for 9/11. Guliani refused to accept his money after his speech, but the prince was not expelled from the nation.
daveleau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 10:02 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
Dave I am not so much talking about practice, rather I am more interested in law.

I do not know if the constitution (in words) protects the US soil or US citizens.
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 10:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 213
cyphen is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to cyphen Send a message via AIM to cyphen
I'm certain we could have had we chosen to, though. Unless you are a US citizen - even if you're on US soil, you are not constitutionally protected. Which only makes sense - you can't have it both ways - either you become a US citizen and submit that these rules apply to everybody, or you don't get the freedoms that go along. Simple as that.
cyphen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 10:08 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
willy_ph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Trent University
Posts: 1,864
willy_ph is on a distinguished road
Non US citizens are guarenteed the same protections inherent in the Constitution as those who are foreigners. This is the result of the fact that the Constitution uses the word "persons" instead of "citizens".
willy_ph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 10:10 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
willy_ph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Trent University
Posts: 1,864
willy_ph is on a distinguished road
As well the Fourteenth Amendment states that the government may not, "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law." Protection being the guarentees enshrined in the Constitution.
willy_ph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 10:11 AM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
Dam typo's
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 10:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
willy_ph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Trent University
Posts: 1,864
willy_ph is on a distinguished road
From the American Civil Liberties Union:

THE RIGHTS OF IMMIGRANTS
In decisions spanning more than a century, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution's guarantees apply to every person within U.S. borders, including "aliens whose presence in this country is unlawful." On the other hand, the Court has said that when the federal government uses its broad powers to supervise immigration into this country, it can exercise those powers in ways that discriminate on the basis of "alienage." In other words, the government has the power to decide who to let into the country and under what circumstances. But once here, even undocumented immigrants have the right to freedom of speech and religion, the right to be treated fairly, the right to privacy, and the other fundamental rights U.S. citizens enjoy.

Since immigrants don't have the right to enter the U.S., those who are not here legally are subject to deportation. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) has the authority to question "any person believed to be an alien as to his right to be in the United States." But in a 1903 case called Yamataya v. Fisher, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the INS could not deport someone without a hearing that meets constitutional due process standards. Since then, procedural rights for undocumented immigrants have evolved so that today, in spite of Congress' attempts to curtail these rights, most people facing deportation are entitled to:

a hearing before an immigration judge and review, in most cases, by a federal court;
representation by a lawyer (but not at government expense);
reasonable notice of charges, and of a hearing's time and place;
a reasonable opportunity to examine the evidence and the government's witnesses;
competent interpretation for non-English speaking immigrants, and
clear and convincing proof that the government's grounds for deportation are valid.

http://www.aclu.org/ImmigrantsRights...m?ID=9361&c=22
willy_ph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2003, 11:10 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Epidemic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
Epidemic is on a distinguished road
Are those court cases backed up by the constitution or legislating from the bench.
Epidemic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 PM.