I'm kinda suprised that this hasn't been tackled yet on here... huh.
Anyway, if you haven't heard, there has been an ongoing complaint against the University of Michigan admissions policies - basically here's the gist-
The claim is that the university's policies amount to a quota system, favoring less qualified minorities over more qualified applicants - which is in essence, in fact, and in deed racial discrimination.
This is going to the Supreme Court. President Bush and his administration have filed a brief with the Supreme Court supporting the claim that this is discrimintion and is wrong and unconstitutional.
I personally agree entirely. There are those who have said this is a big step backwards for affirmative action - i claim it is a big step forward for equality.
The actions of Rosa Parks, the speeches of Dr. Martin Luthor King aim toward a goal that supports the phrase in the Declaration of Independence. "We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal."
The University of Michigan has a point system. To be accepted you must score at least 100 of 150 points. Certain minorities are awarded 20 points simply for the color of their skin. In contrast, a perfect SAT score is worth 12 points. In many cases, a less qualified student is allowed admission, and a more qualified student is turned away. Is this equality? I'm curious to hear some opinions on the subject.
A quote from the President's Speech:
"At the law school, some minority students are admitted to meet percentage targets while other applicants with higher grades and better scores are passed over. This means that students are being selected or rejected based primarily on the color of their skin. The motivation for such an admissions policy may be very good, but its result is discrimination and that discrimination is wrong.
Some states are using innovative ways to diversify their student bodies. Recent history has proven that diversity can be achieved without using quotas. "
Here is a link to the President's Speech