 | |
12-18-2002, 08:29 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Urbana, Illinois
Posts: 1,845
| » 
Massive tobacco suit award reduced
While I have no love at all for tobacco companies, I was glad to see sanity prevail in this case. Today a judge in California reduced that $28 billion award to a woman dying of smoking induced cancer to $28 million. Still excessive, IMHO, but a step in the right direction.
Merry Christmas, indeed.
Now before I get flamed let me say that I'd love to see large awards IF the award went to charity or to pay for health care for other smokers. I just hate to see one person awarded so much for doing something that has been known to be harmful for decades.
__________________
Mark}--->8-8->
If you're not the lead dog, the scenery never changes. |
| |
12-18-2002, 08:34 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: South Bay, CA
Posts: 600
|
Yeah, I know what you mean, M_Six.
In all probability, the award will keep getting reduced, it's just a big legal game. The attorneys will continue to bait each other, the woman in question will die before she ever sees a dime, and what's left of the award will go to.... legal fees...
Thw winners in this case: Attorneys.
Mark my word. |
| |
12-18-2002, 08:36 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Guest |
Hey Knothead, you could win here, too! Just refuse to play the game... QUIT SMOKING!!!
A few more days and I'm gonna bust the thread out... as a reminder...
DEATH TO THE HABIT!!!
| |
| |
12-18-2002, 08:41 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,119
|
[sarcasm] 28 mil? now THATS abit more reasonable. [/sarcasm]
|
| |
12-18-2002, 08:47 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: South Bay, CA
Posts: 600
| Quote: Originally posted by prexaspes Hey Knothead, you could win here, too! Just refuse to play the game... QUIT SMOKING!!! | Hehehe, Prex, never fear, quittin' day draws nigh and I'm just about ready for it. coughcoughcoughcough... |
| |
12-18-2002, 08:53 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Near Chi-town
Posts: 734
|
I pray for the day that judges laugh at the plaintiffs and force them to pay the tobacco companies' legal fees.
From M_Six: Quote: |
I'd love to see large awards IF the award went to charity or to pay for health care for other smokers.
| What about all those awards that were given to the states? Billions upon billions of dollars intended for the treatment of tobacco-related illnesses and also for prevention. 90% of it became pork money. The government doesn't think smoking is wrong; it just wants to collect money so that it doesn't have to increase other taxes or God forbid cut wasteful spending.
|
| |
12-18-2002, 08:59 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Urbana, Illinois
Posts: 1,845
|
I have to agree with you, Mr. Goodbytes.  That money was mismanaged along with everything else. A few short years ago Massachusetts had a massive budget surplus. Now they're cutting people's lifelines in the name of a balanced budget. Sure, 9/11 had a negative effect on the economy, but incompetence and mismanagement is what really emptied the barrel.
__________________
Mark}--->8-8->
If you're not the lead dog, the scenery never changes. |
| |
12-19-2002, 05:21 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: NCSU @ Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,390
|
although i know smoking is harmful, and i think everyone should quit, i still dont think ANY money should be awarded to ANY individual for ANYTHING smoking related. if the individuals are not complete idiots, then they would have known that it was bad for a long time and they are obviously just trying to play the system.
drew
__________________
Duroo
|
| |
12-19-2002, 09:54 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Albany, Ga.
Posts: 1,063
|
cracked
I can tell you have NEVER lost a loved one to tobacco.
Pleae remember PEOPLE HAVE DIED because tobacco companies LIED.
|
| |
12-19-2002, 10:04 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: inside the Beltway, outside the loop
Posts: 1,067
|
I actually agree (in part) with Mr. Goodbytes; I think it's a disgrace that the states are using the tobacco settlement money for non-public-health functions, like roads, schools, police and firemen's salaries, and deficit-reduction.
I'm not being ironic, either; I think those things should be paid for -- by large increases in gasoline and cigarette taxes.
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Most Active Discussions  | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |