Blast from the past. Bernard Goetz is an example of what?

[Epidemic]

Bernard goetz, is proof that more gun control is needed.

or

Bernard goetz, is proof that the 2nd amendment is right.

Here are some links I have found.

Pro Goetz links

http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/Cohen1.html

http://www.amren.com/9610issue/9610issue.html

Pro put upon little kids articles.

http://www.courttv.com/verdicts/goetz.html

[ClubMed]

I was looking for the following option:

Bernard Goezt, is proof that more gun control is needed and that the 2nd amendment is right.

Option #1.

[Theophylact]

Other: One mean SOB with a gun.

[Epidemic]

Mean tough.

Or mean cruel and nasty.

[J-Excel]

We don't need more gun control. We need more people control.

Bernard over-reacted. He should've prolly just shown these thugs the gun and wham they'd be gone. It was not necessary to shoot. But given his history/background, he did what he had to.

But then the same agrument holds for the thugs. Given their background, they did what they had to. They took the risk and got the short end of the stick.

Moral of the Story: Guns incite people to violence. They bring out this "coke-type" (Not Pepsi-Coke, epidemic, Coke Coke) of high in people who take leave of their senses and think they can do it all.

[Theophylact]

Mean tough.

Or mean cruel and nasty.

The latter, I'd say:

...going back and shooting Cabey a second time. "You seem to be doing all right,'" Goetz recalled telling the young man. "'Here's another.'"

[cyphen]

Guns dont' kill people ... bullets do.

[SPEEDO]

A pretty darn good shot!..........................