 | | 
05-31-2002, 04:21 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: So. Californication
Posts: 1,659
|  » 
Photopost watermark on my image??
Just wondering, why is photoPost putting watermarks on all images in the gallery? 
__________________
To fry or not to fry...oh what the heck, let it fry :)
| 
|  | |
05-31-2002, 05:05 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Guest |
Where?? I just looked at your pics and only saw pics..
| |
| | |
05-31-2002, 05:07 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Canada™
Posts: 2,671
|
I, also, see no watermark... 
- Brandon
| |
| | |
05-31-2002, 05:07 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,293
|
Bottom right of only the newest images(2 days, Ithink) this one has it | |
| | |
05-31-2002, 05:37 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Bay Area, CA USA
Posts: 6,966
|
Oh yeah. hmmmm. That's not even a watermark...that's pretty much a blatant ad. Don't know if that's such a good idea Scott.
I think it'd be ok if that little Photopost thing were only added to the medium resolution picture (the first one you see after you click on the thumbnail.)
But then when you click on "view larger image" I would hope that would be showing you the original image, unaltered.
| |
| | |
05-31-2002, 06:07 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: MSU- E. Lansing, MI
Posts: 1,504
|
Seems pretty reasonable to me... I mean it is a free service right?
| |
| | |
05-31-2002, 06:21 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,293
|
I think its Fine, I wonder if he has had people hotlinking?
| |
| | |
05-31-2002, 06:25 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: MSU- E. Lansing, MI
Posts: 1,504
|
prolly, but I thought that was allowed.
| |
| | |
05-31-2002, 06:29 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Bay Area, CA USA
Posts: 6,966
|
Sure, but to alter the original photo (or artwork, as the case may be) just doesn't sit right with me. Any images that are generated by Photopost, like the thumbnail or medium resolution image, then sure, put the PhotoPost tag on those. But I just can't get past the issue of making alterations to the original uploaded photo/image.
| |
| | |
05-31-2002, 06:34 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Bay Area, CA USA
Posts: 6,966
|
See? Check this one out. I think that really sucks. Really sucks.
| |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | | | Most Active Discussions  | | | | |
Recent Discussions | | | | | |
