»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Off Topic Community

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2002, 10:11 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
daveleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: KBAD-Bossier City LA
Posts: 7,487
daveleau is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to daveleau Send a message via AIM to daveleau Send a message via Yahoo to daveleau
slightly tougher science question

Hi everybody!

Doing a bit of thinking on a subject and an idea came to me that has to do with the degredation of isotopes. I know there is a standard half-life for the degredation of molecules, but is there a way to increase the degredation?

If you have I-131, P-32 or tritium (Hydrogen isotope with half-life of 12.32 years, decay rate of 5.626 % per year), can you increase its rate of decay? It does not have to be a practical application. It can be a massive undertaking.

My thought were about carbon dating. I am curious if anything could have sped the decay of C over time to make things appear older than our calculations of C decay show.

Thanks
Dave

daveleau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 10:27 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tatum,Tx
Posts: 392
zgf2022 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to zgf2022 Send a message via AIM to zgf2022
I seem to remember there being a way to affect the decay rate, but i cant remember it at the moment, ill see if i can find out though.
zgf2022 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 10:36 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
TonTo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 118
TonTo is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to TonTo Send a message via AIM to TonTo
Easy,
just take the supertoniom radiustion and subject it to a bombardment of tritium cathlodict ithisium isotopes. This will increase the amount of the decay that the molecules.

Simple enough undertaking.
__________________
One of my users has been computing for 33 years...... older than i've been alive..... soooooo of course I know NOTHING about the tech that I helped create.
TonTo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 10:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tatum,Tx
Posts: 392
zgf2022 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to zgf2022 Send a message via AIM to zgf2022
i found several articles that mention the errors in carbon dating, but nothing about the increased decay rate. although i could swear i have heard something about this before.

here is a link to an article on carbon dating that i thought was very interesting Link
zgf2022 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 10:50 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: MSU- E. Lansing, MI
Posts: 1,504
Gomer is on a distinguished road
hmmmm... My gut feeling is that it is extremely constant. This feeling is that atomic clocks (the most precise means of measuring time) are based on atomic decay.
Gomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 11:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
daveleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: KBAD-Bossier City LA
Posts: 7,487
daveleau is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to daveleau Send a message via AIM to daveleau Send a message via Yahoo to daveleau
I believe that they are currently constant, but I am wondering if massive occurences can speed up the decay. Not sure what...maybe massive amounts of sunspot activity increase/decrease in heat. Something that could happen in the past.
Dave


Tonto-
daveleau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 06:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: TOO close to Wash DC
Posts: 7,956
vass0922 is on a distinguished road
maybe put it in a microwave?
If you think about it, typically the way we "break the rules" to allow us to do things we're not supposed to is with radiation or nuclear manipulation of some sort ...
However, can you radiate radioactive material?
I'd say just go in there, rip of a few protons, make it all lead
Just as easy as that, right?
(not the most stable lead in the world though lol)
__________________
<< Insert exceedingly large and overly verbose message of how 1337 you are here including full specs of every vehicle you've ever driven and PC you've owned >>
vass0922 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 07:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
BFlurie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hagerstown, Maryland
Posts: 3,211
BFlurie is on a distinguished road
Bombarding it w/high speed neutrons and/or heavy ions might do it. Some nuclei would be very resistant to this (like the stable iron nucleus), but radioactive nuclei are inherently unstable anyway. But the economic and safety cost of this would probably be prohibitive.

A nearby supernova, say within 50 light-years, would blast high speed particles at the earth -- mostly protons & alpha particles.

Last edited by BFlurie; 05-28-2002 at 07:06 PM.
BFlurie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 07:12 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
daveleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: KBAD-Bossier City LA
Posts: 7,487
daveleau is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to daveleau Send a message via AIM to daveleau Send a message via Yahoo to daveleau
Well, I am not thinking of ways people do it (speed up C decay), but thinking that natural phenomena ove rthe millenia could have sped things up a bit.

Not totally sure. Not even sure I have the concept of C dating yet anyway. Just a thought.

Thanks
Dave
daveleau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2002, 08:01 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,018
Philip1952 is on a distinguished road
I remember a few years a go on a PBS station. They were making a fake item to fool antique inspectors. They hit it with Xrays from a hospital xray machine. It carbon dated the object they were working on quite a bit.
Philip1952 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 PM.