This was s*** - say it with science

[krusty the klown]

Right, I had this little problem... the experiments were cr@p, most of the other people's experiments were cr@p, too. But that's not what you can put in a PhD. Shame, really.

How am I doing so far?

The construction of a physiologically accurate flow circuit to simulate the lysis of an occlusive thrombus still presents a significant challenge and the results from such a model should be interpreted with full knowledge of the limitations inherent in these simulations.

I guess it encourages 'creative writing'

[Dudster]

"The construction of a physiologically accurate flow circuit to simulate the lysis of an occlusive thrombus still presents a significant challenge and the results from such a model should be interpreted with full knowledge of the limitations inherent in these simulations." - Say what?

Must be good if it sounds like gibberish

[krusty the klown]

It's simple - watch:

The construction of a physiologically accurate flow circuit to simulate the lysis of an occlusive thrombus still presents a significant challenge

Translates: none of our experiments worked.

the results from such a model should be interpreted with full knowledge of the limitations inherent in these simulations

Translates: all these experiments are rubbish, anyway

It would be so much simpler if people could just say it like it is, but I guess it makes some folx feel more important... just like management

[Dudster]

"but I guess it makes some folx feel more important... just like management " - plus the fear of things lowering to "the experiments were cr@p, most of the other people's experiments were cr@p, too"

[caddmannq]

Time to re-evaluate your base paradigm.