Just FYI to those that may or may not be following this... This was on the front page of the National Post (A Canadian newspaper) this morning...
Quote:
PILOT IGNORED ORDERS: SOURCES
'HE BOMBED ANYWAY' AFTER BEING TOLD TWICE NOT TO.
Canadian Military 'not pointing fingers' but indicates U.S. knew of training exercise.
..
The U.S. National Guard pilot twice requested and was refused permission to drop his ordnance after spotting tracer fire in a desert training area near Kandarhar, where paratroopers of the Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry were on a live-fire exercise.
...
The Pentagon said it appeared the pilots did not know they were flying over a training area and the fire from the Canadian exercise made them believe they were under attack.
|
My question is... WHY? He was denied permission not once... but
twice. I'm telling myself that this was a mistake... But why should we pat this guy on the back and reaffirm that it was only an accident? I know that if some kids ran out in front of my car and I didn't have time to stop (
plenty of time to stop, in this situation), I strongly doubt that they waive the manslaughter charges because it was an accident.
- Brandon
------------