We already have very good examples of this kind of practice in some of the big hardware vendors and some of the small tech review sites. A while back I reqacll one guy getting spalled with an injunction by a graphic card manufacturer because he dared say their newest chipset was junk (and backed it up with some reasonable testing).
Go back further and we had a chip maker threatening legal action about a "supposed" error, possibly because they thought it was bad for their market share. Turned out the had to fix it anyway, but that didn't help the little guy who got trodden on along the way...
And should we talk about litigation tactics of a certain giant software company??
Doc, not all judges are as sensible as yours seems to be. And whether we like it or not deals are done between coporations, goverment and individuals all the time.
My suggestion is only make valid, reproducible comments based on fact and experience, and you should be reasonably safe. But remember there is risk in everything
Cheers
Mick