»
 

Go Back   ResellerRatings Store Ratings > ResellerRatings Forums > Off Topic Community

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-15-2002, 05:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Bush Endorses Nevada's Yucca as Nuclear Waste Site

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/2002..._yucca_dc.html


omg i can't believe this! There goes the land.

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2002, 06:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Warthog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Myer, VA
Posts: 5,009
Warthog is on a distinguished road
Quote:
The site in the Nevada desert 90 miles from Las Vegas would store 70,000 tons of radioactive material from the nation's 103 nuclear power plants for an estimated 10,000 years.
Sounds like a good deal to me.

Where else?

Quote:
Reid warned the plan would require the equivalent of 100,000 nuclear waste-laden trucks or 20,000 rail cars moving through 43 states from existing storage sites to Nevada.
Although, that's no fun.
Warthog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2002, 06:12 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Ipswich Suffolk UK
Posts: 1,110
Graham is on a distinguished road
D'ya want some of ours..........cheap?


G
__________________
Nothing moves faster than goalposts.
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2002, 07:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
OuTpaTienT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA USA
Posts: 6,966
OuTpaTienT is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to OuTpaTienT
Do you realize that the people working in the undergroud facility will receive less radiation poisioning than the average US citizen? Because we get more radiation poisioning from the sun each day than they will get from handling that material. Plus they will be protected from the sun's radiation because they're working under Yucca mountain.

If you think the storage containers we keep the stuff in is unsafe to handle or is gonna start leaking in a few years, then you are just not educated on the subject.

Nuclear power plants are the cheapest and the cleanest source of real power that we have. I say "real" power becuase a nuclear plant is capable of tremendous power output while other clean power sources like wind or solar by comparison produce such a small amout of power as to be laughable.
OuTpaTienT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2002, 08:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Chuckiechan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sacto, Colliefornia
Posts: 787
Chuckiechan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
There goes the land.
If I'm not mistaken, that area is off-limits to civilians so you ain't lost anything...!

Also, the more nuclear power we generate the less arabs we gotta schmooze to get their oil....

Nuclear power = energy independance!
Chuckiechan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2002, 06:18 AM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
krusty the klown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Leeds Liverpool Canal
Posts: 1,774
krusty the klown is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Nuclear power plants are the cheapest and the cleanest source of real power that we have
Does the "cheapest" include the whole-life-cycle cost of a nuclear power plant?

It's only safe until you get a bunch of muppets running the show
__________________
Can I play haemorrhoid sufferer number 1? Oooh! Aaah! Oh, that hurts! Is there no relief?

No.

What about the after guy? Oh, that's better! I can ride a bike again!
krusty the klown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Most Active Discussions

Recent Discussions

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 PM.