 | |
04-05-2004, 09:54 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Posts: 20
| » 
9/11 Probably Preventable
Quote: |
In a joint television interview, the commission's chairman, Thomas H. Kean, a former Republican governor of New Jersey, and its vice chairman, Lee H. Hamilton, a former Democratic House member from Indiana, indicated that their final report this summer would find that the Sept. 11 attacks were preventable.
| Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/05/po...rtner=USERLAND Quote: |
Mr. Kean and other members of the commission also agreed in interviews Sunday that the Bush administration's skepticism about the Clinton administration's national security policies might have led the Bush White House to pay too little attention to the threat of Al Qaeda.
|
__________________
MTAtech - 'Fare and Balanced'
Last edited by MTAtech; 04-05-2004 at 10:04 AM.
|
| |
04-05-2004, 09:55 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Urbana, Illinois
Posts: 1,845
|
Oops.
Although to be fair, there is most likely a whole, long string of events that would have had to have happened just right for the attacks to have been prevented. The questioning of Bush administration higher-ups should prove interesting.
__________________
Mark}--->8-8->
If you're not the lead dog, the scenery never changes.
Last edited by M_Six; 04-05-2004 at 09:59 AM.
|
| |
04-05-2004, 12:18 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 400
|
So what I am to take away from this is that if Gore was elected that there would have been shoot down orders given to pilots, Airports would be searching all bags and taking away nose clippers, and the terrorists who were in aviation schools and entered during bill clintons term would have been apprehended.
Interesting. in all likelyhood false ... but interesting none the less.
Now I and virtually everyone believes that it could have been prevented. However absent the attack the required actions would never have passed law enforcement, aclu, Business, Airline, democrat, or republican muster.
Seriously in a pre 9/11 world the actions required to insure the attack did not happen would never have happened.
|
| |
04-05-2004, 12:28 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Healdsburg, CA
Posts: 3,157
|
Of course it could have been prevented. Just like all the other terrorist attcks. So what's the big deal? |
| |
04-05-2004, 01:41 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: sacramento ,ca
Posts: 3,176
|
i don't like bush but i can't put alot of the blame for 9/11 on him nomatter how much i don't like him .
now that that is said . he should take more blame on the amount of the damage i think . after the first plane hit and 3 other were seen off course and not responding i think more should have been done . there was alot of time between each hit . thats where the blame should fall .
but to say that he could have stoped it all . i think that is not the case . sure it could have been stopped but like Msix said there was to much that had to happen to prevent it .
|
| |
04-05-2004, 02:05 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: South Jersey
Posts: 3,081
|
The purpose of the commission was to propose solutions, not point fingers.
But newspaper editors (and other dregs of society) prefer pointing fingers, don't they. I guess it sells more papers.
|
| |
04-05-2004, 04:49 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,533
|
ok, when they say "preventable"..do they mean preventable in the 9 month period after bushs election?? or do they mean preventable if actions had been started going back into clintons period?
Hard to see how it can be laid at Bushs feet...since the problem has been brewing for YEARS..and especially since Clinton was in office for 8 years and then Bush for 9 months...and AlQaeda was obviously active and strengthened during Clintons reign.
JP
__________________
"Even a fool is thought to be wise if he is silent"
|
| |
04-05-2004, 05:02 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Sacto, Colliefornia
Posts: 787
|
What they mean is that knowing what they know now, it is. Before 9-11 they didn't know what to prevent. They knew they had a terrorist organization in Afganistan, but they didn't have the cajones to just plain tell them to get out or we will throw you out!
We had been groveling to the UN for ages about this problem and that problem and were blown off, and being blown off seemed to meet the political needs of Bill Clinton.
"Hey, I asked and the UN said No. I've done all I can. Send in my intern!"
__________________
"I pledge allegiance to school vouchers and to the values for which they stand"
|
| |
04-05-2004, 05:43 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Contributing Editor
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: CJ,MO:REBEL Base
Posts: 2,169
|
Preventable eh? I'll just call up Tom Clancy, he can write a book on how Jack Ryan Jr. saves the the twin towers.
|
| |
04-05-2004, 05:47 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: NW burbs of Chicago
Posts: 538
| Quote: |
now that that is said . he should take more blame on the amount of the damage i think . after the first plane hit and 3 other were seen off course and not responding i think more should have been done . there was alot of time between each hit . thats where the blame should fall .
| what was he going to do??? order 3 civilian carrying jets shot down by military fighters?? u got to remember even tho there was time inbetween the hits there wasnt enough to notice what was happening because it had never happened like this before
remember hindsight is 20/20
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Most Active Discussions  | | | | | Recent Discussions  | | | | | |