Isn't there a Federal Law [Family Defense Act ?] passed about three years ago by Congress that prohibits in regard to Gay Marriages the application of the Constitution's
Full Faith and Credit clause , which requires --among other things -for one State to honor the Legal effects , say of marriage, of another State?
So the City of San Fransisco "gay marriages" don't have to be honored outside of California?
Isn't such a Federal Law itself Unconstitutional since it nullifies in a specific situation Constitutional language by Congressional action --without benefit of the Constitutional Amendment process?
And are those "gay marriages" themselves --which are not provided for in California State Law
NOT in fact even Legal in California?
Which renders moot the Unconstitutionality of nullification of a Constitutional clause by Congress-- by the very lack of a legal stature of the putative marriages themselves in it's own State? Aren't they in fact illegal in California?
Without a State Law giving San Fransisco's Gay marriages stature, there is nothing for the Supreme Court to Certify a case against the nullification by Congress of what the Constitution says --i.e. the Full Faith and Credit clause.
Why is it that California is always dishing up the Conundrums?
DOH ! Can NYS be err..."norml" by these standards
And where is
Theophylact in times like these
Must be Washington, DC, that is "normal" even when it passes Unconstitutional Laws chosing what it wants to apply the Constitution to..
MegalosSkylaki
D
G
Linear Mode
