Thanks for the clarification Scott

. BTW - you can ignore that email - faster than I thought

.
I was hoping that it acts as a "bump" when editing the eval and gives a more accurate information on how customer service / RMA's are being handled now and not 3 months ago.
I know I don't read 27 pages on a retailer - just a general snapshot (good and bad) to get a feel for a retailer and take in all of the statisics you compile.
This time it was only a $200 FUBAR and a whole lot of time lost because of their mistakes. I'll handle that this time but I would be really PO'ed if it was the normal couple grand I spend on a site and the parts are defective

- with the response I got.
The only bad thing about your interview on the Screen Savers is that this company in question got plugged.
Thanks again!
Mike