I have to share this about Yan to anyone who thinks he is even remotely a good guy or one of the few good people at Memory Suppliers.
How this works:
The bank has to honor a charge if you have the funds on your Credit Card, but you can rebuke this and they will reverse the charge and the company that charged you has 45 days to respond to the reversal. They can send a letter of rebuttal and recharge you and again you will need to send a rebuttal letter to get the charge reversed. If the company does nothing for 45 days then its over and you win. If they do recharge you within the 45 days and you don't send in a letter of rebuttal to the charge and the letter the company sends to the bank within an allotted time, you will end up keeping the charge and have to pay it.
I have been in this game of ping pong with Memory Suppliers for months now because they take advantage of every 45 days they get. I also want to point out that I still have this problem even after changing my card number. I just don't see the charge because its kept on my old account until I send my rebuttal letter. It would be transferred to my new account if I didn't send in a rebuttal.
The good news is that Memory Suppliers' time is running out and they are in the process of digging their grave and at some point the CC Company is going to be filling it in with Memory Suppliers still standing in it.
But I digress, lets get back to Yan. Recently I sent a letter and forwarded all the latest information about my case to the WA Attorney General agent that was helping me earlier just to keep him informed of what was happening. I told him it was for his records only as I am dealing with MS through my bank's CC Company now. Well, he forwarded my letter onto MS. Yan replied to that letter and said the following:
He talked the same drivel about ECC/non-ECC memory and how it was ok that they substituted my order of non-ECC memory with ECC memory (without asking me). Then he want on to say:
Quote:
Second addressing an issue regarding Memory Suppliers, Inc. not being a reputable company... Please do check our reseller ratings, http://www.resellerratings.com/store/MemorySuppliers
All Store Avg. is 7.38 we are at 8.89 for lifetime and 9.25 for the past 6 Months. Also, this issue has been handled through Credit Card Company as well. On the last dispute, the Credit Card company denied Ms. C**'s charge back.
This issue had been going on for some time now, and as stated to Ms. C** previously just like there Certain Laws that citizens are to follow, there are Store Policies that customers are to follow. In this case Ms. C** is trying to bend the rules in her favor by going against Memory Suppliers, Inc.'s policies, which is not only Morally wrong, but Ethically wrong as well.
Respectfully, Yan B*, 800-979-9707 x 227,
*** @ memorysuppliers.com [information edited for privacy concerns]
Memory Suppliers, Inc
|
The parts that I bolded are what stood out the most for me. I was a mix of angry, flabbergasted and laughing my butt off. That first bolded statement is a flat out lie. The person at my CC company thinks we have a good case so I don't think I have been denied yet.

That second one though, oh man . .
Is it moral and ethical to:
- Lie to the WA AG agent?
- To try and use the customer's money to bribe then to give you a good review?
- To lie to the customer by substituting their order for something else without asking the customer first and trying to hide it by sending the original packing slip with the substituted item so the customer thinks they got what they originally ordered?
- To lie to the customer and say they will be refunded the charges they paid to expedite the original order when it was sent out late? (this is from the beginning of this mess, but illustrates their dishonest nature)
- To then expect to have the customer loose money (in the form of a store credit) over an item they didn't order?
- To expect the customer to pay a restocking fee for an item they didn't order?
- To act like its not your problem when your substitution of an order causes the customer's motherboard to get hosed?
Also, how many of those positive reviews are legit? Who was bullied into giving a good review? Who was bribed to give a good review? What reviews were made by MS's employees? One thing I have noticed is that when a negative review is printed a lot more positives show up. When no negative review is posted there aren't as many positives posted in that time frame.
I think I could go on with this for some time, but I have a life and need to get back to it now. I just wanted people to see this side of Yan.